ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN

Information

ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN

We debate origins of the Universe, life, Earth, humans, religion, atheism, using common sense, evolution, cosmology, geology, archaeology, and other sciences, to repel biblical creationism and other religious beliefs.

Location: Oxford University, England
Members: 4188
Latest Activity: on Friday

The portrait is Charles Darwin, age 31, in 1840

We welcome comments and the opening up of new discussions in this busy group. So join us if you are not already in the group.

N.B. At the end of every discussion page is a box that you can tick if you want to be notified by e-mail about the arrival of fresh comments.

Discussion Forum

Ancestral humans had more DNA

Started by Steph S.. Last reply by Gerald Payne on Friday. 6 Replies

Researhers Turn Off Obesity Gene in Mice

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Susan Stanko Aug 22. 5 Replies

Mini moons may zip around Earth

Started by Steph S.. Last reply by Gerald Payne Aug 19. 3 Replies

explanation for reality Theism or Atheism?

Started by dudaboli yev. Last reply by Joseph P Jul 31. 5 Replies

Fossils illustrate evolution of life

Started by Steph S.. Last reply by Gerald Payne Jul 27. 1 Reply

On Abolishing Religion

Started by Rounaq Biswas. Last reply by Gerald Payne Jul 16. 69 Replies

Researchers Say There Might be Life After Death

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by John Jubinsky Jul 15. 56 Replies

On the scientific miracles of Qur'an

Started by Rounaq Biswas. Last reply by Daniel Gotro Jun 26. 25 Replies

Modern Humans Interbred with Neanderthals in Europe

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Gerald Payne Jun 25. 3 Replies

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN to add comments!

Comment by Marc Draco on January 5, 2012 at 4:46pm
If Charles needs to learn anything it's some manners. Netiquette, if you prefer.

This all-guns-blazing stance is unhelpful to the point of being repugnant.
Comment by Joseph P on January 5, 2012 at 4:26pm

I was going for something more along the lines of, "Dude, you cannot be for real."

 

Not strictly-speaking Poe's Law, but its cousin.

Comment by Susan Stanko on January 5, 2012 at 3:48pm
Comment by matthew greenberg on January 5, 2012 at 2:25pm

Kyu, you may be right.  one must have 'tiger blood' to spend time in Branson, MO. 

Comment by Kyu on January 5, 2012 at 2:19pm
Charles, when you speak of a plan to win, I feel that's more in the Charlie Sheen sense than a rational, thought out course of action.
Comment by matthew greenberg on January 5, 2012 at 1:46pm

who is Poe and what's his #???  if he can do something about this i'll call him myself!

Comment by dr kellie on January 5, 2012 at 1:39pm

No, but I'd love to legalize pot, which is the number one cash crop right here in the good old USofA. 

 

I'm with Joseph P.  Poe!

Comment by matthew greenberg on January 5, 2012 at 1:11pm

you mean YOUR truth.  sorry, Charles, but you do not possess absolute truth any more than the religious claim to.  to claim that your views on such a complex issue such as legalization of a drug vs. the already legal other drugs like alcohol or nicotine is ignorant at best, delusional at worst.  have you even smoked pot?  you don't even know the basics, which is obvious since you seem to think that we get our pot from Columbia.  you should focus on things you do know about, although i can't quite figure out what they are yet. 

 

also, please explain what you are doing that is so brave.  you are writing on an Atheist blog and starting a book of some sort.  and this will somehow save us all???

Comment by Troy Gorsline on January 5, 2012 at 1:09pm

Huh?

Maybe I am missing something - it's happened before. This post is very confusing to me personally.

I would; however, like to point out not all alcoholics are homeless. Not everyone who uses alcohol are alcoholics (I apologize truly for your brother). Though I do question the sanity of religious people, I can't recall the White House ever being blown up. I believe it was set aflame once, but blown up? Maybe I need clarification.

Comment by Joseph P on January 5, 2012 at 1:07pm
Can we call Poe on Charles, yet?
 

Members (4186)

 
 
 

© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service