ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN

Information

ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN

We debate origins of the Universe, life, Earth, humans, religion, atheism, using common sense, evolution, cosmology, geology, archaeology, and other sciences, to repel biblical creationism and other religious beliefs.

Location: Oxford University, England
Members: 4195
Latest Activity: Aug 15

The portrait is Charles Darwin, age 31, in 1840

We welcome comments and the opening up of new discussions in this busy group. So join us if you are not already in the group.

N.B. At the end of every discussion page is a box that you can tick if you want to be notified by e-mail about the arrival of fresh comments.

Discussion Forum

Neanderthals, Denisovans and ancestor X

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joan Denoo Aug 7. 3 Replies

The evolution of work

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Joan Denoo Jul 12. 61 Replies

Has man evolved?

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by John Elder Jun 18. 5 Replies

The Probability Of Being

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by John Elder Jun 11. 4 Replies

Johns Hopkins Receives $125,000,000 to Fight Cancer

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by John Jubinsky Apr 1. 2 Replies

A new theory explaining the origins of life?

Started by Donald L. Engel. Last reply by Donald L. Engel Mar 31. 5 Replies

Map of Archaic Ancestry

Started by Qiana-Maieev. Last reply by Joseph P Mar 29. 5 Replies

Homo Erectus food processing

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joan Denoo Mar 19. 1 Reply

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN to add comments!

Comment by matthew greenberg on January 6, 2012 at 1:54pm

there are lots of good discussions listed above, but it seems the comment wall has been hijacked from an escapee from a mental ward.  if there is a moderator for this group it may be time to take action. 

Comment by Kyu on January 6, 2012 at 1:51pm
I am perfectly cognizant of the world I live in, painfully so. But stooping to the mentality and tactics of those mired in religious thought is abhorrent to me. I hold myself to a higher standard. Violence brings violence, never peace or understanding.
Comment by Troy Gorsline on January 6, 2012 at 1:34pm

We all lost loved ones on 9/11.

That comment is out of line.

And still no excuse to give into the hate that allowed such attacks-the same hate, mind you, religion employs.

Comment by Troy Gorsline on January 6, 2012 at 1:25pm

Who is "they" anyway.

Like it or not, "we" (athiests) who live in America are also in the wars directly - hence the post from the military family.

Thank you for the service and sacrifices, Justalysn. You are truly a credit to your country.

Please also be aware that by thinking and posting "us" vs. "them" mentalities are the exact mentalities of the extreme religious you are so venemous about.

Comment by matthew greenberg on January 6, 2012 at 1:14pm

all will be well once Charles wins the Pulitzer (assuming they don't care about spelling), runs for President, then blows up the whole damn world in the name of religious intolerance.

Comment by Kyu on January 6, 2012 at 12:49pm
Your arguments fail to find traction in your chosen audience, so you resort to name calling like a frustrated child? Tsk, tsk.
Comment by Troy Gorsline on January 6, 2012 at 12:48pm

Yet something else I take exeption to and disagree with. It isn't cowardice to be tolerant. It is courageous actually. Cowardice is giving in to ignorance and hate-to allow oneself to degrade to the lowest emotions in our nature.

I have been nice to this point - I am tolerant. But the last comment left me confounded. To give into hate is militant at its lowest point.

I would check your own courage levels, Charles, before calling into question the courage of others.

Comment by Alecks Gates on January 6, 2012 at 12:09pm
The only thing I despise more than intolerant religious people is intolerant non-religious people, usually because they feel more entitled to themselves.
Comment by matthew greenberg on January 6, 2012 at 11:52am

80% sounds about right to me.  as for Charles and where his views might be better received, might i suggest Bellevue. 

Comment by Troy Gorsline on January 6, 2012 at 11:37am

Given further thought, I will concede to 90%. Heck, that number is prob. too generous.

See? Free discussion does work!

 

Members (4192)

 
 
 

© 2016   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service