Politics, Economics, and Religion


Politics, Economics, and Religion

Religion has so many connections to political and economic beliefs, there needs to be a place to identify linkages, problems, goals, options, action plans and evaluation criteria.  

Members: 108
Latest Activity: on Saturday

What is the purpose of life?

An eternal question, what is the purpose of life?, occupied philosophers’ thoughts throughout history. Stone pictographs reveal even primitive peoples reflected on this query. Each one has the capacity to define his or her personal thinking about politics, economics and religion.

Discussion Forum

Presidential election - last time around Michelle Obama said : "The truth matters." Republicans are laughing all the way to the bank at the quaintness of such a naive thought.

Started by Bertold Brautigan. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Sep 24. 23 Replies

Ben Carson: Big Bang A Fairy Tale, Theory Of Evolution Encouraged By The DevilIt's nice that the Republicans have Dr.(!) Ben Carson as their house n-word. He's cute, articulate, humble and smooth, and his speech patterns are oh, so laid back and…Continue

Tags: Carson, creationism, evolution, primary, election

A View of Islam from Muhammad Syed: Ex-Muslim

Started by Loren Miller Sep 23. 0 Replies

There is a great deal of discussion that goes on about Muslims and Islam in the US which comes from people who are not, themselves, directly connected with either the people or the religion.  Muhammad Syed, president of Ex-Muslims of North America,…Continue

Tags: Muslims, Seth Andrews, ISIS, Islam, Muhammad Syed

Pope Francis: Priests Can Forgive Abortion If Women Are 'Contrite'

Started by Bertold Brautigan. Last reply by Loren Miller Sep 2. 26 Replies

Frankie has just pissed off (and nonplussed) a whole load of people.The Vatican has…Continue

Tags: Pope, mercy, forgiveness, abortion

Change.org Petition - Jon Stewart Should Host a Presidential Debate

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Grinning Cat Sep 1. 9 Replies

The above petition just landed in my inbox a few minutes ago ... and I think it is perhaps one of the most brilliant ideas I've heard in a while.  Entirely too many debates, both primary and presidential, have been little more than photo ops for the…Continue

Tags: change.org, petition, debate, Jon Stewart

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Politics, Economics, and Religion to add comments!

Comment by tom sarbeck on August 14, 2014 at 12:38am

Were the monks in de Sade's Justine atypical?

Comment by James M. Martin on August 13, 2014 at 6:02pm

Well, Tom, we are not all cut out to be monks.

Comment by tom sarbeck on August 12, 2014 at 7:06pm

CC (newly devised texting talk for chuckle, chuckle. It's not yet in the Urban Dictionary).

When I dumped Catholicism I imagined myself facing a huge void and checked out several non-xian religions. As I recall one of Buddhism's requirements was that I have no attachments.

It was too much like Catholicism's self-denial. I was in my 20s and had a few things I wanted to do. They included doing what C'cism wanted me to quit doing: jerking off. Bye bye, Buddhism.

Comment by James M. Martin on August 12, 2014 at 6:54pm

You did, Joan Denoo, and the Yoga Aphorisms of Patanjali once inspired me. The kleshas make sense even if you do not believe in a deity (though of course a Hindu would find this unpardonable). Ignorant is what I call most politicians; egotists come in all colors and stripes; attachment plagues those in a capitalist society: we are attached to our food, our TV, &c. Aversion and clinging I always called the twin kleshas. Simply put, if you are attached to unhealthy foods, you better not count on clinging.

Comment by Joan Denoo on August 12, 2014 at 6:20pm

Kleshas? OK I'll go on a hunt: 

"Within these key principles we find the five kleshas, or obstacles to the means to liberation:

"ignorance, egoism, attachment, aversion and clinging to life."

~ Patanjali Revisited: A Run Down on the 5 Kleshas- by Bibi Lorenzetti 

@ James, did I fine the correct definition? 

Comment by James M. Martin on August 12, 2014 at 5:34pm

@Tom. I think so. I went through a phase in my occult years of devotion to the principles of the Hindu and Buddhist tantrics, although my version of sadhana was a lot more complicated. I loved the sayings of tantric sages. For example, and I have substituted my own substances for western simplicity: "There is no difference between a palm's worth of chocolate and a palm's worth of shit." (Maybe William S. Burroughs had this in mind when, in one of his routines, he had the wealthiest family in America -- say, the Waltons -- taking their new son into the family board room. Or maybe it's that hobby store. And the president, probably his grandfather, takes into the board room shitter and says, sit there until you dump, money's not worth the shit from your body.) I cannot imagine why any human needs a billion dollars unless it is to feed his kleshas.

Comment by tom sarbeck on August 11, 2014 at 10:33pm


I like existentialism. Therefore, the people you identify and the drunks or mentally ill sleeping under bridges have equally meaningful life purposes.

Comment by James M. Martin on August 11, 2014 at 10:18pm
Comment by James M. Martin on August 11, 2014 at 10:12pm

The only purpose of life is to do something worthwhile in it even if it doesn't directly help people, as with inventing an ebola vaccination. Poets contribute as much as epidemiologists, as do artists, composers, &c. All art is magic. All of our origins are chance events. What free will there is will always be helped or hindered by that one aleatory operation.

Comment by tom sarbeck on August 11, 2014 at 9:13pm

What Joan says about parents and children in different socio-economic classes is so very true. The consequences for the less advantaged children are tragically true.

And so:

1) the political conservatives' bootstrap talk, and

2) the religious rewarding-the-deserving talk,

are both euphemisms for social Darwinism.

They are correct in that giving effect to either or both will improve the gene pool.

The means they choose for that end horrifies liberals and perhaps progressives.

Do the opposing parties sit down and talk about issues that are not easy to talk about, or do they continue to attack each other?


Support Atheist Nexus

Supporting Membership

Nexus on Social Media:

© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service