Information

Richard Dawkins

I don't think he needs a description :)

Members: 1474
Latest Activity: Jul 9

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Richard Dawkins to add comments!

Comment by Joan Denoo on November 28, 2010 at 6:39pm
Paula, your response makes very good sense to me. There is so much more to celebrate, having access to all our senses to see, hear, smell, taste, feel, and realize that you and I are part of all this splendid universe. We are not under some obligation other than to see our earth and all its aspects as part of this wonder. I especially love looking at the stars and seeing how gigantic it all is, or looking through a microscope and seeing how small it is. Gigantic/small and you and I have the great gift of being able to be a part of it.

I realize I do not own it, I participate in it. I am not under an obligation to obey it, I enjoy it. I am not required to sacrifice myself for it, I breath it, drink it, eat from it. I grow a splendid garden, but I do not grow flowers, I grow soil ... it is the caring for the soil and the microbes in it, that I receive the delicious and beautiful bounty.
Comment by Paula T. on November 28, 2010 at 2:09pm
Personally, I have found great fulfillment since leaving the Roman Catholic church.

I'm much more willing to listen to someone who knows more about the world of science, rather than a man who has not lived any type of secular life, has not had any scientific study/instruction, has not had any type of intimate relationship with a women, only has knowledge of religious life. Rational? Not very.
Comment by Hugh Kramer on November 28, 2010 at 1:55pm
Have you heard yet? Atheism is irrational?

Walter Brandmuller is a newly-minted cardinal. The former president of the Pontifical Committee for Historical Sciences in Rome only received his red hat on Nov. 20th but he's already in the news thanks to his just-published book "Ateismo? No grazie! Credere è ragionevole" (Atheism? No Thanks! To Believe is Rational). In it, the 81 year old cardinal addresses the irrationality of atheism by pointing out that only in God can people find fulfilment.

He also takes on Richard Dawkins.

More here.


Comment by Paula T. on November 19, 2010 at 6:35pm
That's quite interesting! I wonder if Game Theory, in some form, was a required class in high schools or universities, if it would somehow change our collective actions in any way. Thank you for sharing that story, Joan.
Comment by Joan Denoo on November 19, 2010 at 6:17pm
In my graduate studies, Game Theory helped us experience power and conflict by the way the games were structures. For example, one game was to divide our class into three groups. The strong women, as the Upper Class, had access to all the resources, including food, blankets, firewood, and determined who could come and go or do what was needed. The Middle Class was all the other women. The Lower Class were all the men and they had to relinquish their shoes, jackets, writing materials, everything except the clothes on their backs. It was a two week exercise in the middle of winter at an isolated camp site. In effect, the Lower Class were "bare-foot and pregnant." The task was to see how the game would play out with the differences in personalities and classes and methods used to get food and resources to the lower class. The men decided, on their own, they would not use physical force to get resources they needed. It very quickly dissolved into the kind of experiment Stanley Milgrim had with prisoners and guards. The Upper Class would relinquish nothing, the Lower Class became helpless and hopeless and the Middle Class blamed everyone for not communicating or negotiating. During the debrief, we looked at individual and group behaviors and ways we could have solved the problems of basic needs for the Lower Class.

A powerful way to learn about power and conflict.
Comment by Joan Denoo on November 19, 2010 at 5:50pm
I'd love to see Dawkins' documents on YouTube but not on commercial TV. Every "Pissie Fitter" in the country would wet their pants.
Comment by Nathan Hevenstone on November 15, 2010 at 11:00pm
@Mike K:

Yeah, I saw that via @rdfrs on Twitter.

I want to comment and thank them for advertising it, but I can't log in. The log-in page and the reset password page keep refreshing after I input the requested info...

Anyways, I agree with a doco centered around "The Ancestor's Tale" That was such a great book.

@Loren:
You're lucky. All of the Bible shows on the History Channel shown here in the States end it either ambiguously (it's possible) or run entirely on the assumption that teh Bible is true to begin with.

You have to realize that, ironically, the USA is perhaps the most religious country in the developed world (ie amongst all first-world countries). And it's ironic because it was founded on the basis of secularism (by Freemasons, no less).
Comment by Loren ɟɟןoʍ on November 15, 2010 at 10:44pm
They aired the History Of Charles Darwin on paid TV here in South Africa (I think Nat Geo). It was shortened quite a lot though. We had one other, I think snippets of Enemies of reason. We also had through the wormhole on Sunday night on Discovery Science. This is all on cable TV. On the History Channel we often have documentaries on the Bible where by the end of each episode myths are busted!
Comment by Nathan Hevenstone on November 13, 2010 at 12:39pm
BTW everyone... here's the petition: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/2/get-richard-dawkins-on-tv-in-the-s...

PLEASE sign it. If I can get 100,000 signatures by January 12, that would amazing! American Atheists agreed to advertise it, so that's exciting... :D
Comment by Nathan Hevenstone on November 13, 2010 at 12:37pm
Like I said... they've shown pseudoscience shit. But don't forget... the Mythbusters are on Discovery, and so is Headrush.
 

Members (1470)

 
 
 

Support Atheist Nexus

Supporting Membership

Nexus on Social Media:

© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service