Secular Sexuality

(NSFW) A no-taboo approach to sexual education and health.

Members: 668
Latest Activity: Jul 10

Sex for fun and non-procreation!

In this world, we can't get away from religion. We've been exposed to false information regarding contraception failure rates and experienced the STD scare tactics. Some of us may even have gone through abstinence-only sex education!

Here in Secular Sexuality we will discuss:

-sexual health in light of peer-reviewed science
-safe for work guides on safe(r) sex (or links)
-questions that would shock the religious

This discussion forum is moderated. Unsophisticared trolls and judging other people will not be tolerated. If you would like to see a topic addressed, or have a question, add it to the comment wall, or message an admin.

Message The Nerd if you want an invite to the X-rated group, for topics not allowed on Atheist Nexus.

Discussion Forum


Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joseph P Mar 2. 9 Replies

Pot Lube

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joseph P Jan 18. 1 Reply

Genital Video Game Controllers

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Jan 3. 0 Replies

The other side-women and sexual freedom.

Started by Cheryl Kerkin. Last reply by SBMontero Dec 20, 2014. 39 Replies


Started by BJ Saylor. Last reply by Joseph P Jul 7, 2014. 17 Replies

Sex Tips

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Grinning Cat Jun 10, 2014. 6 Replies

Ezekiel 23:20 – Bible Porn?

Started by Garaidh Mac an tSaoir. Last reply by Gwaithmir May 14, 2014. 5 Replies

What do you yell in bed?

Started by Angie Jackson. Last reply by Gwaithmir Mar 24, 2014. 137 Replies


Started by Pockets. Last reply by Mink Laubenthal Jan 16, 2014. 30 Replies

FREEOK 2013 - Emily Boyer: "Secular Facts on Sexual Acts"

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Loren Miller Jul 2, 2013. 2 Replies

gender reveal parties

Started by dr kellie. Last reply by TNT666 Jun 27, 2013. 25 Replies

Men have sex and women make love. Or do they?

Started by tom sarbeck. Last reply by dr kellie Jun 24, 2013. 8 Replies

Clits 101

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Jun 18, 2013. 5 Replies

On sexual objectification and subjectivication

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by tom sarbeck May 3, 2013. 18 Replies

Does sex keep you younger?

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by tom sarbeck May 3, 2013. 9 Replies

Music during sex

Started by Splurgen. Last reply by Glenn Friedman Apr 10, 2013. 48 Replies

How flirty is too flirty for a married person?

Started by Saint Fillan. Last reply by Kevin Boleyn Mar 27, 2013. 9 Replies

Sexual Harassment and Assault at Hooters

Started by EJN. Last reply by Gwaithmir Mar 22, 2013. 21 Replies

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Secular Sexuality to add comments!

Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on June 18, 2013 at 11:27pm

You're right, Keith. Barbarella's machine was called The Excessive Machine.

In other news, this is a creative condom ad.

Comment by Keith Brian Johnson on June 18, 2013 at 8:15pm

The orgasmitron wasn't in Barbarella. It was in Woody Allen's Sleeper.

Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on June 18, 2013 at 5:56pm

Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on June 8, 2013 at 3:46pm

Is this an updated version of Barbarella's Orgasmitron?

What do you mean, they're not "dangly bits"! *wink*

Comment by Grinning Cat on June 6, 2013 at 12:07pm

Dr. Jill McDevitt writes:

The Sexologist: It's called a penis

Americans are famous for being developmentally stunted when it comes to sexuality. [...] If the world was an art museum, America would be the 12 year old who giggles at the statue of David, and says “tee hee, I can see his ding-a-ling”.

Case in point: a news headline I saw yesterday from [...] a major news network in a major metropolitan area, and they ran a headline that read “Man Sues South Philly Sex Shop, Claims Gel Burned his Weenie”.

Are you kidding me? Weenie? He burned his WEENIE? It’s so utterly absurd it’s laughable.

[...] I get it. Most people around here were taught not to talk about sex. [...] these things are so bad and so taboo, we dare not even speak their names.

But I dare. Penis. Penis. Penis. Vagina. Testicles. Labia. Vulva. Clitoris. Scrotum. Chances are you have at least one of these things on your body. And this is what they’re called. Not dangly bits. Not honey pots. And definitely not weenies.

[continue reading]

Comment by Grinning Cat on June 6, 2013 at 11:59am

Only tangentially related to sexuality, but still worth a look:

Dr. Jill McDevitt,

Yes, it was hot out there this weekend, but one man may have been a bit… ahem… too underdressed.

I was on a family bike ride this Saturday at a local park when a man on his bike sped past us wearing nothing but shorts and sneakers. No shirt.

I stopped and did a double take because I was in such shock. It’s one thing to shed your clothes when it gets hot, but this guy was taking it to an entirely different level.

[continue reading at]

Comment by tom sarbeck on May 9, 2013 at 7:02am

This group gets fewer visitors than it deserves. Are Victorian attitudes responsible?

I'm about to start a new discussion that led to some "warmly" expressed views in a coed writers group.

Comment by Bobbi Cadence on May 8, 2013 at 7:44pm

Hi there! I am new to Atheistnexus, and I am not online much.

I am also on FB, Ravelry, and I have a wordpress-blog.
I do not consider myself a "weak" Atheist simply because I am NOT 100% Sure that God-Gods-Goddess Exist or not. I simply say I don't know, but I live my life according to the "natural laws" of this planet, NOT the bible written thousands of years ago when people "knew" the earth was flat.

Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on April 29, 2013 at 11:24pm

Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on February 26, 2013 at 11:15pm

Bang With Friends: The Beginning Of A Sexual Revolution On Facebook?

You install the app, then the app lists your Facebook friends of the opposite sex. You click if you’d like to “bang” them, and no one ever knows . . . that is, unless one of those friends installed the app and elected to bang you, too.

“We wanted to keep it simple,” one of the creators tells Co.Design. “See your friends, choose your potential bangs, and then get notified privately via email when you have a match. Wham, bam, thank you new friend with benefits!”

With my wife’s permission, I took Bang With Friends for a spin. After installing the app, I was greeted by a Pinterest-y wall of potential hook-ups: An old co-worker. A friend from high school. A cousin. A minor. A dude. My wife. Lots of my friends’ wives. My mother-in-law, but, thank god, at least not my mom (apparently, there’s at least one filter at work here).

A few smarter filters would no doubt, make the app less inherently awkward (it’s hard to believe that family members should make the list). But then again, filters imply a certain level of judgement. And if Bang With Friends is anything, it’s a nonjudgmental corner of your social, digital life...

The author says it only lists your friends of the opposite sex, but "a dude" responded. How did that work?


Members (667)


Support Atheist Nexus

Supporting Membership

Nexus on Social Media:

© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service