The World's Largest Coalition of Nontheists and Nontheist Communities!
This is a group to promote skepticism and critical thought.
Latest Activity: Sep 26
Started by Luara Dec 13, 2013.
Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Tony Carroll May 20, 2013.
Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by John Jubinsky Dec 24, 2010.
Brian Dunning tends to be right on. However, when it comes to Economics or Politics he doesn't seem to stick to his own guidelines for skeptical inquiry.
Yes, he can manifest the worst of what calls itself skepticism. In medicine as well. For example, in one of a series of InFact videos purporting to tell people The Truth about things, he tells us
There are actually only a tiny number of people who have to avoid gluten, basically those with celiac disease
I pointed out to him some of the recent research on non-celiac gluten sensitivity, which affects about 10% of people, many more than have celiac disease.
But even if this research hadn't been done - saying that only people with celiac disease need to avoid gluten, makes the assumption that the research on people's reactions to gluten is complete!
And there is no reason to think that, and since science has not yet figured out everything about people's reactions to gluten, the best that people can do is to take an empirical approach to whether they're better off with a gluten-free diet.
Brian Dunning making that assumption is an example of a kind of "skeptical" prejudice, making unwarranted claims that science knows more than it does. It's a skeptic not being skeptical about science.
Welcome toAtheist Nexus
Sign Upor Sign In
Or sign in with:
Nexus on Social Media:
© 2015 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.
Report an Issue |
Terms of Service
Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.