Writing to Congress

Many of us are angry and despairing at the political landscape, especially with the recent unprecedented threats to democracy itself in the United States.

Let's pool our brains and amplify our influence! Letters and phone calls to our elected officials make an impact, even if they don't always do what we ask, since they're ultimately concerned about "reelection, reelection, reelection".

Especially with help from our friends, it's not difficult to write letters calling for specific actions and telling powerful stories. We can share talking points, drafts, and letters we've sent, as well as problems we encounter and replies we get.

(The title refers to the U.S. system, but you're welcome to share how you're communicating with your elected officials in any country.)

If you read this group and haven't joined it, please consider joining! It'll encourage other AN members to be more politically active.

Members: 11
Latest Activity: Aug 8

Discussion Forum

Keep Families Together Act

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Grinning Cat Jun 21. 10 Replies

The actions of the current administration have had me incensed practically from the time they took office.  The depths to which they wish to descend appear to have few if any limits.  However, with the current action being taken against immigrants…Continue

Tags: Keep Families Together Act, Jeff Sessions, Donald Trump

Letter to Rep and Senators Regarding New Congressional Freethought Caucus

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Loren Miller May 23. 3 Replies

The following letter has just been posted to the following Congresspersons:Congresswoman Marcia FudgeSenator Sherrod BrownSenator Rob Portmanand will be shortly followed by hard-copy letters sent by US Mail:As you well know, the United States was…Continue

Examine your state legislators

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Jan 1. 2 Replies

The Center for Public Integrity presents a data base of state level legislative conflicts of interest. Find your state legislators' financial interests…Continue

Tags: state political corruption

Robert Mercer's psyops behind the extremist takeover

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Bertold Brautigan Aug 17, 2017. 6 Replies

Two hundred years ago the founding fathers created three branches of government, assuming that one party wouldn't dominate all three at once, and assuming that the legislative and executive branch actually wanted to govern the country as a…Continue

Tags: changing beliefs, white supremacist takeover, data analytics, psychological warfare, bio-psycho-social profiling

Action alerts and talking points

Started by Grinning Cat. Last reply by Grinning Cat Jun 13, 2017. 4 Replies

Where do you find useful information on issues to communicate with your legislators about, or talking points you might not have thought about for calling or writing them?Continue

Tags: representatives, legislators, congresscritters, senators, political actions

How are we doing ? As of February 17, 2017

Started by Joan Denoo Feb 17, 2017. 0 Replies

block H.R.958 elimination of the Environmental Protection Agency - Wasteful EPA Programs Elimination Act of 2017, 115th Congress (2017-2018) | (Became law)block Neil Gorsuch for Supreme Court (Hearing is set for March 20)cosponsor and support S200,…Continue

Tags: support, confirmation, oppose, campaign, writing

How To Write Letter to Congressional Representative.

Started by Daniel W. Last reply by kathy: ky Feb 16, 2017. 3 Replies

This is a little different, but not much, from how to write letter to Senator.  Again, this info is from wikihow.  There is overlap with the Senator letter writing concept.…Continue

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Writing to Congress to add comments!

Comment by Grinning Cat on August 8, 2018 at 4:07pm

...a man who cannot keep his own lies straight... The Putin summit and immigration atrocities indeed correlate with an increasing number of lies from Popular Vote Loser, now averaging 7.6 lies a day.

I've been calling my senators just about every day to oppose Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court, or any Trump judicial nominee for that matter. Some points:

- Kavanaugh believes that a sitting president should basically be above the law, not tried or charged or even investigated. This while the very legitimacy of his election is in question.

- Accused criminals do not get to choose the judges who will review or suspend or dismiss their case.

- New: Kavanaugh believes a president can simply ignore laws that he asserts are unconstitutional, as in numerous signing statements from the Bush White House.

I've told my congressman that the House needs to pass the congressional resolution of disapproval already passed by the Senate to restore net neutrality.

I've told all three of my members of Congress to oppose the new proposal that would make it harder for legal immigrants to become permanent residents or U.S. citizens. "Trump's proposal would prevent legal immigrants from obtaining citizenship or green cards if they [or their household members have] ever used social programs like the Affordable Care Act, children's health insurance, or food stamps. The proposal is the brainchild of Stephen Miller and would not require congressional approval. If enacted, it would represent the biggest change to the U.S. legal immigration system in decades, and more than 20 million immigrants could be affected." (NBC News via What The Fuck Just Happened Today) The proposal would redefine "public charge" in the immigration regulations. It might not require congressional approval, but like other federal rulemaking, could be overruled by a congressional resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act (just like the fight to restore net neutrality).

Comment by Loren Miller on July 18, 2018 at 9:22am

The Trump - Putin summit was bad enough.  To listen to Rob Portman react to Trump's "correction" by saying that "I take him at his word" was about 10 squares past ludicrous, especially when members of his own party were considerably more critical.  With that in mind, Senator Portman has just gotten yet another little bon mot from yours truly:

Your reaction to Trump's "correction" regarding the Trump - Putin summit was almost as embarrassing as the summit itself was. You appear to be attempting to carry water for a man who cannot keep his own lies straight, a fact which Politifact confirms on a daily basis. That doesn't even address the fact that Trump effectively kowtowed to the leader of a nation which has been dedicated to frustrating if not dismantling the international relationships which have kept it and him under at least relative control. Such behavior does not deserve support; it deserves at least criticism if not sanction.

Trump's utter ineptitude at foreign relations does not deserve even the kind of knee-jerk support you have offered. How about growing a backbone and challenging him to do better, which, considering the current situation, wouldn't be all that hard?

Comment by Loren Miller on July 17, 2018 at 7:54pm

Go right ahead, Joan. The Senate needs to know that they're behind the 8-ball with Trump. Kick ass and take names!

Comment by Joan Denoo on July 17, 2018 at 7:29pm

@Loren, A great letter. I plan to plagiarize it, send it to my Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers, sign it as my own with thinks to you. Is that OK with you?

Comment by Loren Miller on July 17, 2018 at 8:20am

Yesterday in Helsinki genuinely pissed me off ... to the point where the following just went into Senator Rob Portman's inbox:

Enough is enough.  Yesterday, before a worldwide audience, President Trump sided with Vladimir Putin over American intelligence agencies in the matter of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.  These agencies have in recent days locked down and quantified the actions of Russian agents who actively worked to subvert social media in the service of their own ends in assisting the election of Donald Trump.  Yet Trump ignores or denies this critical violation of the integrity of our electoral process.  THIS IS INTOLERABLE.  If you wish to remove yourself from the hole you have dug for yourself in supporting Trump and his policies, you will cease to support this Manchurian Candidate of a president and his actions which have undermined and are undermining our democracy.

It is well past time to put country over party.  DO IT.

Yeah, it's a bit testy, but Portman continues to defer to Trump, when a great number of his Republican colleagues are calling out Trump for that disaster of a summit meeting. This Crap Has Got To STOP!

Comment by Loren Miller on July 11, 2018 at 8:50am

This just went out to Rob Portman, via his website:

Let me be clear about this: DO NOT, under any circumstances, support Donald Trump's nomination of Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court.  It's bad enough that Kavanaugh seems to think that a 17-year-old girl being forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term is not an undue burden, while a church being required to fill out a five-entry form IS such a burden.  Kavanaugh has stated the opinion that the president should be exempt from prosecution while in office.  Such an argument is specious at best.  This nation survived both Richard Nixon's resignation and Bill Clinton's impeachment and kept right on running.  There is no reason why Trump should be treated any differently.  Donald Trump should NOT have the chance to place himself above the law, certainly not while being under investigation, and especially not considering the kinds of results that Robert Mueller's team has yielded to date.  Kavanaugh's opinion, translated into law, would be tantamount to that effect.

This is no time for "deference" to a president who has been a loose cannon from Letter A.  It is time to hold him to account, and part of doing so means rejecting Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court.

I see no need to copy Sherrod Brown on such a note.  Sherrod knows the score on a guy like Kavanaugh.  Portman?  Not so much.

Comment by Grinning Cat on July 10, 2018 at 1:22pm

Some points I used when calling my Senators' offices opposing Brett Kavanaugh's (or any Trump nominee's) nomination to the Supreme Court:

(for the Democrat, who in my case previously announced he'll strongly oppose anyone tRump names) it would continue and enshrine for decades tRump's elevation of corporations (with "political" and "religious" "beliefs" and "rights") above actual human beings. See Citizens United and Hobby Lobby.

(for both) a president under active criminal investigation -- related to the legitimacy of his election -- should not be allowed to nominate judges who'll be reviewing his case!

(for the Republican) when his constituents see how SCOTUS is hurting actual Pennsylvania citizens, the senator's enabling of the Trump court will become a reelection liability. [Yes, it's a speculative "prophecy"; but let him be afraid of it being fulfilled!]

We need to contact our Senators EVERY DAY about this!

Comment by Grinning Cat on July 6, 2018 at 2:51pm

I called my Republican senator's office about the upcoming Supreme Court vacancy left by Anthony Kennedy's retirement, and about Trump's stated desire to nominate a justice who respects the Founders' "original intent". That original intent was arguably one where slavery was OK and women couldn't vote. Also, corporations as legal "persons" with deeply held political and religious "beliefs" (Citizens United and Hobby Lobby) were most certainly not part of that original intent!

Better to recognize the broader original intent of providing a mechanism to amend the Constitution as we become more enlightened and get better at recognizing the rights and freedoms of Americans!

Comment by Grinning Cat on June 18, 2018 at 4:44pm

Thanks, Loren! And I'll add a few more noteworthy bits from the text of the "Keep Families Together Act" in your discussion.

The more of us call and write and visit, the more staffers' time is taken up by issues we're concerned about, the more likely the members of Congress are to get the message that their reelection depends on paying attention to their constituents.

That's why for phone calls, I prefer to talk to human beings rather than leave voicemail. It's too easy for a staffer to listen to just the beginning of a saved message, decide "She's for the bill" or "He's against the bill", and not hear the whole thing. I want to know that some person is engaged with my entire message.

Comment by Loren Miller on June 18, 2018 at 4:23pm

Most excellent, GC ... ROCK ON!


Members (11)




Update Your Membership :




Nexus on Social Media:


© 2018   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: The Nexus Group.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service