Climate Concerns

The "CLIMATE CONCERNS" group is dedicated to discussion regarding the topic of the ever present and serious issue of changes to our climate due to the introduction into the atmosphere of human induced effects which prove harmful to the environment and which eventually may prove destructive to our planet. 

Members: 55
Latest Activity: Jan 30

Reference/Research Sites

Discussion Forum

Reconstructing the Tunic from Lendbreen in Norway.

Started by Joan Denoo Jan 30. 0 Replies

Melting glacial ice in Norway revealed a tunic dating from AD 230 to AD 390.…Continue

Tags: to, 390, reconstruction, 230, AD

Odd results of Climate Change

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Jan 3. 78 Replies

Take an amusing quiz to learn about unexpected effects of Climate Change. After each multiple choice question, you see if you were right (and the right answer if you weren't).…Continue

Tags: odd effects of Climate Change

Arctic melting increases California drought

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Jan 1. 1 Reply

Remember the Ridiculously Resilient Ridge?...scientists have found that rapidly melting Arctic sea ice now threatens to diminish precipitation over California by as much as 15% within 20 to 30…Continue

Tags: Climate Change, California drought

Free Digital Content Hides Costs

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Dec 14, 2017. 0 Replies

Is the digital economy a systemic driver of carbon emissions? We're so easily tricked by seemingly free services.Indiana University professor Nathan Ensmenger, environmental historian of the…Continue

Tags: carbon footprint, externalized costs, hidden costs, outsourced costs

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Climate Concerns to add comments!

Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on February 3, 2017 at 10:17pm

Good-bye forever to 400ppm CO2.

image source
Comment by Grinning Cat on January 22, 2017 at 7:00am

If only global climate destabilization / AGW could be ameliorated as easily as the Denier-in-Chief deleting all mention of climate change from the White House website, moments after he took office!

Two pictures from the Women's March in Philly, one of 600 sister marches yesterday to the Women's March in Washington DC (whose attendance far eclipsed tRump's inauguration):

Let our kids die of old age, not climate change! Facts matter (Sign at the Women's March in Philadelphia 1/21/2017)

Science is not a liberal conspiracy [with drawing of the earth] (Sign at the Women's March in Philadelphia 1/21/2017)(Many other signs affirmed, "Science is Real", as well as "Black Lives Matter", "Trans Lives Matter", and other sayings.)

Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on December 17, 2016 at 6:19pm

To change from the serious talk, sort of, how about a satire from The Onion .

Saying the multinational oil and gas conglomerate had “really dodged a bullet,” ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson told reporters Wednesday how relieved he was now that it was finally too late to do anything about climate change.

... he felt as if a tremendous weight had been lifted from his shoulders now that catastrophic climate change was an inescapable certainty.

Comment by Čenek Sekavec on December 15, 2016 at 1:05am

Don:  Yep.  They make pains to point out that the recent stuff is not peer reviewed. Wish they would make more of a distinction between which are and aren't, but nothing can be done.

I know about the ice core data.  Was pointing out that some periods when that ice was being made were times when the arctic had zero ice according to the model and confirmed by geological strata.

Zero ice, but without the CO2 / Methane levels.

Therefore while we are within parameters for natural phenomenon with elevated levels we are also a partial influence. 

It's ridiculous to say we can exist on this earth and *not* influence it. Anthropogenic change is a fact.

Ruth:  Your graph and Don's graph match up rather nicely :)

Comment by Donald L. Engel on December 14, 2016 at 4:15pm

Ruth, the Little Ice Age hit bottom around 1600, but it skidded along the bottom until between 1680 and 1700,  They were still ice skating on the Thames River in the early 1800s.  It was dropping into the lowest point from 1300 to 1600, but the ice age lasted from 1300 to about 1800. 

Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on December 14, 2016 at 3:58pm

If the Denier in Chief did do away with White House press briefings, irony strikes, since they're the ones who gave him millions of dollars of free advertising.

Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on December 14, 2016 at 3:07pm

Donald, you said that, "...the climatologists have said that the global temperature has been rising at about 1.5 degrees C per century."

I don't know your source, but this makes no sense to me.

According to NASA, "In the past, a one- to two-degree drop was all it took to plunge the Earth into the Little Ice Age." Your rate of change implies that the Little Ice Age happened only a hundred years ago. It happened from 1300 to 1600.

NASA says that the global average surface temperature rose 0.6 to 0.9 degrees Celsius (1.1 to 1.6° F) between 1906 and 2005. That's 0.3°C in about a century, not 1.5°C, and most of that increase is in the last few years rather than being evenly distributed.

Just since we've had these discussions, we've seen the temperature jump from 0.85°C rise to this year's 1.2°C rise.

My impression is that you read an unreliable source which promotes fake news about climate change. New cherry-picked or misleading claims keep appearing. In the case of this claim, it seems the author's intent was to reassure readers that the current rate of rise isn't new or frightening.

Here's a NASA climate temperature graph till 2015, that I modified by putting in the predicted 1.2°C rise for 2016.

Doesn't the latest slope look steeper to you?

And no, it's not all from El Nino.

Comment by Donald L. Engel on December 14, 2016 at 3:01pm

Ceneck, you gave this URL in an entry lower on this page:

Did you read that report?  The author switched poles in the middle of the article.  He started talking about the Arctic losing ice, and then switched to the Antarctic and said the ice is growing, and not receding.  Then I read about the author, and it says he is a co-founder of the Tea Party.  That pretty much explains the trickery involved in his article.

Comment by Grinning Cat on December 14, 2016 at 2:25pm
Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on December 14, 2016 at 12:18pm
Scientists who produced the annual Arctic Report Card warned the situation was changing so quickly it was “outpacing our ability to understand and explain” what they were witnessing.

“The warmest temperature anomalies were centred on Alaska, Svalbard in the Atlantic sector and the central Arctic,” the report said.

Arctic temperatures have hit levels last seen a ridiculously long t...


Members (53)




Update Your Membership :




Nexus on Social Media:


© 2018   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service