Politics, Economics, and Religion

Information

Politics, Economics, and Religion

Religion has so many connections to political and economic beliefs, there needs to be a place to identify linkages, problems, goals, options, action plans and evaluation criteria.  

Members: 119
Latest Activity: Jul 21

What is the purpose of life?

An eternal question, what is the purpose of life?, occupied philosophers’ thoughts throughout history. Stone pictographs reveal even primitive peoples reflected on this query. Each one has the capacity to define his or her personal thinking about politics, economics and religion.

Discussion Forum

The Corporate Power Deadlock and Anthropogenic Climate Disruption

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Jul 21. 0 Replies

Will Denayer's article thrusts us into startling clarity, by summing up our climate/economic/political situation.How climate change…Continue

Tags: fossil fuel corporations deadlock on governments, climate model failures, Anthropogenic Climate Disruption

Pew: Nonbelievers Make Up Largest "Religious" Bloc (Washington Post)

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Plinius Jul 17. 18 Replies

The title rather says it all.  Nevertheless, details matter.  Here's the story from this morning's Plain Dealer (16 July, 2016):…Continue

Tags: plurality, nones, Pew, religious

I have a theory

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Plinius Jul 16. 1 Reply

I have a theory and I have had it for a long time. It started when I realized that religion was nothing more than myths and fables turned into sacraments and scriptures, that they were created by human beings, and they did not tell the truth. From…Continue

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Politics, Economics, and Religion to add comments!

Comment by Joan Denoo on June 17, 2016 at 2:28pm

Trump simply does not see how stupid and unworkable his ideas are. His line of thinking/non-thinking will backfire and grant the terrorists more recruits. He would divide the world and the world will be seriously harmed. 

Comment by Grinning Cat on June 11, 2016 at 11:30am

A general connection between U.S. politics, economics, and religion:[Republican Party ('GOP') elephant logo with crosses instead of stars] For he that hath, to him shall be given: and he that hath not, from him shall be taken even that which he hath. Mark 4:25 [open Bible]

Comment by Bertold Brautigan on June 6, 2016 at 6:20pm

Here's another great comment on the idiot and his book.

https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2016/06/05/nick-cohen-on-h...

Comment by Joseph P on June 6, 2016 at 5:42pm

Oh, I missed when you first posted that, Bertold.  I only noticed it when I popped in to read these last two posts.  I'll go give that a read.  Thanks.

Comment by Joseph P on June 6, 2016 at 5:39pm

Steve Shives is currently reviewing a book that is arguing that the enlightenment was actually a bad thing, Cat.  They're definitely out there.

Comment by tom sarbeck on June 6, 2016 at 7:12am

|    ...they're only saying it for their credulous sheep, ....

They and the GOP do have credulous sheep.

Who else has seen the three small ebooks titled Liars for Jesus? I have them and the lies xians tell amaze me.

If we had the money to put their lies on billboards, ....

Just dreaming...

Comment by Grinning Cat on June 6, 2016 at 12:22am

Back to general political commentary:

The Five Circles of Conservative Hell, which nicely illustrate what they're really out to "conserve":

The Five Circles of Conservative Hell: [outer to inner] Preserve Cultural Privilege / Preserve the Aristocracy / Repeal the New Deal / Repeal the Constitution / Repeal the Enlightenment

(h/t Ruth)

Comment by Bertold Brautigan on May 31, 2016 at 9:06pm

Joseph  - if you're interested, Jerry Coyne posted an interview with the author, followed up by a rebuttal with Lawrence Krauss (a real friend of Christopher's) 

https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2016/05/20/taunton-vs-krau...

Comment by Joseph P on May 31, 2016 at 12:04am

That's even more preposterous than the usual shenanigans that they pull, Bertold.  We already have real articles that Hitchens wrote from his death-bed.

I'd say that it's ridiculous, since they're not fooling anyone, but they're only saying it for their credulous sheep, not anyone who would know better.  A lot of the religious sheep will accept the most ludicrous things without examination, as long as those things confirm what they want to be true.

Comment by Joan Denoo on May 30, 2016 at 6:42pm

Ruth, there isn't sound on the GIF with Trump & Sanders. Can you send me the URL for that video clip, please?

 
 
 

line

Update Your Membership :

Membership

line

line

Nexus on Social Media:

line

© 2016   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service