Politics, Economics, and Religion


Politics, Economics, and Religion

Religion has so many connections to political and economic beliefs, there needs to be a place to identify linkages, problems, goals, options, action plans and evaluation criteria.  

Members: 108
Latest Activity: 11 hours ago

What is the purpose of life?

An eternal question, what is the purpose of life?, occupied philosophers’ thoughts throughout history. Stone pictographs reveal even primitive peoples reflected on this query. Each one has the capacity to define his or her personal thinking about politics, economics and religion.

Discussion Forum

TIPP - an EU push for massive tar sand crude imports

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner 11 hours ago. 0 Replies

The proposed TransAtlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), the Atlantic nations version of TPP, will foster runaway climate change. The European Union wants unfettered imports of U.S. crude…Continue

Tags: TransAtlantic Trade and Investment Partnership

TPP - what's been leaked

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joan Denoo Nov 6. 6 Replies

Public Citizen warns of known dangers hidden in the Trans Pacific Partnership. Even with the extreme secrecy, we know enough, due to partial leaks of the secret text, to be very afraid. For instance, we know the TPP would:Lower U.S. wages by…Continue

Tags: corporate tribunals, overcharging for medication, outsourcing US jobs, food and safety threats, TPP

Kevin Kruse on How Corporate America Created Christian America (YouTube)

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Joan Denoo Oct 23. 8 Replies

It isn't very often that something goes upside my head with the kind of impact that happened yesterday afternoon, when the 38th Annual Convention of the Freedom From Religion Foundation had as one of its guest speakers Kevin M. Kruse.  Mr. Kruse is…Continue

Tags: One Nation Under God, Kevin Kruse

Presidential election - last time around Michelle Obama said : "The truth matters." Republicans are laughing all the way to the bank at the quaintness of such a naive thought.

Started by Bertold Brautigan. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Sep 24. 23 Replies

Ben Carson: Big Bang A Fairy Tale, Theory Of Evolution Encouraged By The DevilIt's nice that the Republicans have Dr.(!) Ben Carson as their house n-word. He's cute, articulate, humble and smooth, and his speech patterns are oh, so laid back and…Continue

Tags: Carson, creationism, evolution, primary, election

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Politics, Economics, and Religion to add comments!

Comment by sk8eycat on July 15, 2015 at 7:07pm

I knew by the time I was 13 that I never wanted to have children, so I didn't.  I had 3 abortions before The Pill was available, and before Roe v. Wade, and I have NEVER regretted it or felt ashamed. 

I would have been a lousy mother, and have never hesitated to tell people so.

Comment by Joan Denoo on July 15, 2015 at 1:11pm

Abortion is a nasty subject and one difficult to discuss without getting emotionally tangled. Those who oppose abortion have every right not to have an abortion. Those who have compassion for women know that abortion is not only an option, it is a necessary part of health care. If males developed a growth of some kind because of sexual intercourse, there would be a necessary law to protect the end of the growth. A fetus is a growth of cells that ultimately forms into a human. Women have the right to say "NO" to sexual intercourse, or use some form of contraceptive, or choose to abort. Women know they terminate a pregnancy and that is their right. It is also their burden. Fathers of aborted pregnancies have no say in the matter because they have no right to interfere with mother's rights. 

OH! I know! I will get hate mail for my position. Hate mail goes into the garbage bin.

A debate, on the other hand,  offers the opportunity to discuss both sides. I am able and willing to take on the topic. 

Thanks, Bertold, for the link. 

Comment by Bertold Brautigan on July 15, 2015 at 12:27pm

Salon ran a follow-up article on the Planned Parenthood sting:

Planned Parenthood’s biggest problem is not “selling baby parts”: W...

. . . No, Planned Parenthood is not illegally selling baby parts. Yes, the organization is donating fetal tissue and being reimbursed for transportation costs, which “is standard across the medical field,” according to Planned Parenthood spokesperson Eric Ferrero. The sting, which took place nearly a year ago, doesn’t tell us much about fetal tissue donation, a practice that Planned Parenthood is open(ish) about providing only now that it’s come under fire. Why we don’t talk about the practice more is worth discussing, but we’ll get to that in a moment.

First, let’s acknowledge the sting for what it is — the latest addition to an ongoing game of what we’ll call Deceitful Anti-Choice Mad Libs, which goes a little something like this: “This condensed, heavily edited video proves that Planned Parenthood does X horrifying thing in possible violation of Y federal law (except we don’t have much additional evidence about that whole ‘illegal’ part, so you’ll just have to trust us on this one).” It is the result of a carefully crafted attack that an anti-choice group has been working on for months, yet another example of an extreme viewpoint in an already polarized debate about abortion care.

Comment by sk8eycat on July 14, 2015 at 11:08pm

So organ-leggers are selling stem cells.  BFD.  How come amputees aren't lining up for a share?

Comment by Bertold Brautigan on July 14, 2015 at 8:28pm

This just out from Catholic Vote:

An interview with a high-level national Planned Parenthood employee coldly discussing sale of fetal body parts as business as usual.

So I wonder how this will pan out.

Why do I have the strangest feeling that if this story were legit it would be breaking in at least the grocery store tabloids, if not in more respectable publications.

Comment by tom sarbeck on July 9, 2015 at 1:35am

The free enterprise system we hear so much about has been a subsidy enterprise system at least since adoption of the 1787 constitution.


The agreement in the Convention to redeem at face value rather than at market value the paper that entitled Revolutionary War veterans to land. Speculators had paid needy veterans a fraction of the paper's value.

Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on July 8, 2015 at 10:07pm

"... $10 million a minute is how much the world’s governments are spending to subsidize the burning of coal, oil, and natural gas."

World Governments Subsidize the Burning of Fossil Fuels to the Tune...

Comment by Plinius on July 5, 2015 at 2:31am

They are still at it, Bertold, but they had different pictures in the fifties. I still like Doré's steel engravings...

Comment by tom sarbeck on July 4, 2015 at 6:56pm
  • And now these people have the Internet and e-books to push their evil dogma.

Bertold, do we any longer have to ask where America's violence originates?

We too have the internet and e-books. We outnumber those sick and depraved people and can use the internet and e-books to expose them.

We evolutionists know that natural selection is wasteful. Given the statistics on miscarriages, natural selection might be more wasteful than religion. It's far more wasteful than that version of Puritanism.

Comment by Bertold Brautigan on July 4, 2015 at 2:53pm

Support Atheist Nexus

Supporting Membership

Nexus on Social Media:

© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service