Politics, Economics, and Religion

Information

Politics, Economics, and Religion

Religion has so many connections to political and economic beliefs, there needs to be a place to identify linkages, problems, goals, options, action plans and evaluation criteria.  

Members: 119
Latest Activity: 4 minutes ago

What is the purpose of life?

An eternal question, what is the purpose of life?, occupied philosophers’ thoughts throughout history. Stone pictographs reveal even primitive peoples reflected on this query. Each one has the capacity to define his or her personal thinking about politics, economics and religion.

Discussion Forum

Central banks and governments have lost the plot

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Joan Denoo yesterday. 3 Replies

The Gold Bull Is BackI write what some call a "contrarian" point of view. The things I read and hear from commercial media is that we are in recovery, there are more jobs…Continue

Tags: wealth, destruction, stocks, depression, gold

A most interesting exercise in fantasy

Started by Bertold Brautigan. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Aug 21. 2 Replies

The One Speech That Could Turn Donald Trump From Villain To HeroPatheos - August 16, 2016 by Benjamin L. CoreyArticle…Continue

Tags: Trump

Global Elites Failing

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Aug 4. 0 Replies

The new challenge for climate action? PopulismDoug Hendrie sees the disenfranchised rejecting the globalization being…Continue

Tags: climate change, fossil fuel addiction, protectionism, nativism, nationalism

The Corporate Power Deadlock and Anthropogenic Climate Disruption

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Jul 21. 0 Replies

Will Denayer's article thrusts us into startling clarity, by summing up our climate/economic/political situation.How climate change…Continue

Tags: fossil fuel corporations deadlock on governments, climate model failures, Anthropogenic Climate Disruption

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Politics, Economics, and Religion to add comments!

Comment by Joseph P 7 hours ago

@Joan

Yeah, the big problem with the arguments that people like Penn make isn't that they aren't validly constructed arguments.  They often aren't validly constructed arguments, but even when they are, they aren't grounded in reality.

To go to one of my favorite, obscene examples, there's Adolph Hitler.  If Hitler's rhetoric was correct, and the Jews, down to a man (and woman), were a monstrous race that was intent upon the destruction of society, then the extermination of them would have been a positive act to save the rest of humanity.  But of course, Hitler was wrong, or at least he was a vicious, sociopathic monster who was willing to use the demonization of a minority group to advance his own ends ... you know, sort of like Donald Trump and Muslims.

There's then the further issue with Penn's argument, in that a removal of taxation would destroy society as we know it.  There has to be a certain consequentialist element to any moral argument.  The consequences of stopping mandatory taxation are too great to allow it.

His equation of taxation with theft/holding-a-gun-to-your-head is also bullshit.  You don't have to use US currency.  Using it requires the acceptance of the social contract that goes along with it, though, ie. taxation.

There are people who manage to go completely off the grid.  They live off the land and are self-sufficient.  There are plenty of places out west where you can do that, and the government will more or less leave you alone.

The absolute, libertarian position that Penn and others are supporting is one of the purest entitlement.  They want the benefits of society without the costs of living in that society.

They like being able to drive on public roads and highways without having to pay for the public roads and highways.  They want to live off of the labor of the poor without supporting the needs of the poor.  I find it very disgusting.

And no, I don't care if he moderates his arguments a bit, in the second half of the video, as a concession to reality.  I couldn't make it past 4 or 5 minutes, myself.  The fact that his ideals are represented by the first half of the video is the important part.

Comment by Joseph P 9 hours ago

So, let me see if I have this straight, Tom.  You don't think that there are ... let's see:

voter-suppression laws
state-level theocratic laws
anti-sodomy laws
gay-marriage bans
abortion bans

Are you really saying that you don't think that those things exist?  Dude, they're all active laws in my own state, as well as all throughout the southeast, southwest, and mid-west.

The North Carolina constitution bans anyone who doesn't believe in a god from holding public office, and conservatives tried to enforce that ban as recently as 2009 (http://www.cbsnews.com/news/effort-to-remove-atheist-from-city-coun...) when an Asheville city councilman was open about his atheism.

I explicitly mentioned the Lawrence v. Texas Supreme Court ruling, which took place in 2003.  Up until that ruling, it was perfectly legal in most of the country to arrest people and throw them in jail for having gay sex.  Police in many parts of the country are still doing it, despite it being long-settled at the highest level of the court system.

My state only recently had it's voter suppression law struck down (http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/30/us/federal-appeals-court-strikes-...), which was the most oppressive such law in the country.  It targeted racial minorities and college students.

Organized prayer in public schools is only illegal because of a Supreme Court ruling against it, along with many other theocratic elements which have similarly been struck down at the federal level.  And schools all over the country are still doing it.

And we have many states trying to shut down every abortion provider within their state.  The so-called personhood laws and constitutional amendments would completely ban abortion, and Oklahoma even passed a law that would revoke the medical license of any doctor who performed an abortion, except for within a very tiny set of circumstances (http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/oklahoma-house-bill-total-abortion-ban/).

I remember which questions I asked, but I couldn't believe that you were actually so oblivious to the world around you that you thought they weren't a thing.

So, Kim Davis refusing to issue marriage licenses, as well as the head of the Supreme Court of Alabama directing judges in the state not to issue gay marriage licenses, isn't good enough for you?  Do you even keep up with the news?  You won't see news stories about this sort of stuff, if you don't pay any attention to the world around you.

What do you even mean about people being arrested for violating those laws?  How would someone even be arrested for violating a voter-suppression law?  If they can't comply with the restrictive laws, they simply can't vote.

Comment by Joan Denoo yesterday

Joseph, you make your point very well, and I change my mind about what I wrote. I was wrong, in part, that I made the assumption that choosing to flip burgers and have babies would satisfy one who passed the entrance tests of an institution. A bright person or one who desires a quality of life different than the one flipped hamburgers will supply will use intelligence and perseverance to do better. 

I stand by what I said that both men and women fall into a trap when they can't leave to go to school or follow their bliss. When two people decide or by accident have a child, that too often cuts off their ability to take advantage of exploring a dream. 

It was interesting to watch my three children, and nieces and nephews who had lofty dreams of being pilots or doctors, and when their hormones kicked in they abandoned their dreams. Too many of them never did find a new idea and felt angry at their children because the parent felt trapped. What a  situation. 

My daughter fell into that trap. She had a baby girl, and the father was a lay-about, incredibly immature. Laura supported all three of them, studied under a tutor to develop her computer skills until she could make a change. She left with her baby and created her own business. She is 52 now and very successful, with a handsome husband who works incredibly hard, she has two lovely girls and six bright grandchildren.  

Not everyone has the intelligence or the determination to make good on her/his own. 

I know that people such as Laura need to have help, financially. It is to the society's benefit to provide assistance for those who struggle to create better lives for themselves. I am not willing to pay taxes to enable someone to be a layabout. I willingly pay for self-improvement. I need talented plumbers, electricians, carpenters, accountants, medical personnel, legal professionals, more than I need hamburger flippers. I am willing to help someone develop his or her skills. 

Comment by tom sarbeck yesterday

{   When people have violated which laws, Tom?

Joseph, the laws you mentioned in your long post 17 hours earlier than this one.

Your long post, my reply 11 hours ago that you have questioned, and a bit more inspired me to start the discussion on disposing of mental clutter.

Did you forget what you posted?

Comment by Joseph P yesterday

When people have violated which laws, Tom?  The Voting Rights Act?  Those have been violated, man.  The day after the SCotUS decision.

If you mean other laws, then please specify.  What are you talking about?

Comment by tom sarbeck on Friday

Bert, that MIGHT not be so.

The Republican Party before Reagan invited the evangelicals to join was more Libertarian and favored small government,

After the evangelicals joined at his invitation the Party became authoritarian and favors big government.

The Libertarians still in the Party don't care when or where people put body parts and the rest. The authoritarians don't have minds able to handle much else.

Comment by Bertold Brautigan on Friday

The funny thing about people who push for "smaller government" is they want government to stop taxing and regulating business, but they tend to be just fine with government dictating when and where you can stick body parts and preventing people from using contraception, getting abortions, etc. It boggles my mind that people don't see through this hypocrisy and hiss them off the stage.

Comment by tom sarbeck on Friday

Idaho, that guy a wakkadoodle?

No. He might be helpful in another contest.

The wakkadoodles are those who won't be helpful.

Comment by tom sarbeck on Friday

Joseph, the questions in your post below reveal you as a thinking voter. I consider myself a thinking voter because I've asked the same or similar questions.

It's more mind clutter than I want so I use a kind of filter.

I decided that I will get answers to them only when the news tells me that people have violated the relevant laws and are being prosecuted.

I'm now able to clutter my mind with stuff that's more important to me.

Comment by Joseph P on Friday

You bet.  Most states have a religious requirement to hold ANY sort of public office, even water and soil commissioner.  Those articles in their state constitutions are only invalid because they're superseded by the federal constitutional-prohibition of such requirements.  I think that over half of our state constitutions now have explicit bans on gay marriage and the recognition of gay marriages from other states, too.

Over half of the states would immediately implement minority voting restrictions, too, just like they did immediately after SCotUS struck down the article of the Voting Rights Act which required approval by the federal courts, before any law affecting voting could be implemented in certain states.

Seriously, what the hell were those judges thinking?  It wasn't even a 5-4 decision.  They wrote something to the effect of, "This article is unnecessary, since those states have not shown this sort of behavior recently."

Yeah, because the legislators in those states knew that those restrictions would never go into effect, since the federal government would shut them down before they could be implemented.  Literally the DAY after the ruling, though, many of the states that had been on the list immediately passed laws restricting voting.  We have many states that would love nothing more than to roll civil rights back to the 50's or earlier.

 
 
 

line

Update Your Membership :

Membership

line

line

Nexus on Social Media:

line

© 2016   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service