Politics, Economics, and Religion


Politics, Economics, and Religion

Religion has so many connections to political and economic beliefs, there needs to be a place to identify linkages, problems, goals, options, action plans and evaluation criteria.  

Members: 124
Latest Activity: 7 hours ago

What is the purpose of life?

An eternal question, what is the purpose of life?, occupied philosophers’ thoughts throughout history. Stone pictographs reveal even primitive peoples reflected on this query. Each one has the capacity to define his or her personal thinking about politics, economics and religion.

Discussion Forum

80% Stock Market Crash To Strike in 2017, Economist Warns

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Joseph P yesterday. 5 Replies

80% Stock Market Crash To Strike in 2017, Economist Warns“A $68 trillion ‘Biblical’ collapse is poised to wipe out millions of…Continue

Tags: overvalued, stocks, economic, crash

Nonviolent Resistance is All That's Left

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Feb 14. 0 Replies

Chris Hedges says our institutions were already hollowed out by corporate elites, so  "A sustained, nationwide popular uprising of nonviolent obstruction and noncooperation is the only weapon left to save the republic."…Continue

Tags: mistaking vulgarity for courage, corporate elites, rise of US totalitarianism, nonviolent obstruction, democratic institution credibility

Steve Bannon Believes The Apocalypse Is Coming And War Is Inevitable (Huffington Post)

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Loren Miller Feb 9. 12 Replies

WASHINGTON ― In 2009, the historian David Kaiser, then a professor at the Naval War College in Newport, Rhode Island, got a call from a guy named Steve Bannon. Bannon wanted to interview Kaiser for a documentary he was making based on the work of…Continue

Tags: apocalypse, Steve Bannon, president, Drumpf, Donald Trump

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Politics, Economics, and Religion to add comments!

Comment by Daniel W on December 17, 2016 at 10:48pm

Problem:  Low information voters determine election in unfavorable manner.


(a) demean them.  ridicule them.  judge them.  then they will voter better next time.

(b) give money to democrats so they can use the money to make more calls to collect more money so they can use the money to make more calls to collect more money so...

(c) talk about them in internet echo chambers where hello... hello... hello... hello.... we are so much better than they are.

(d) Strategize how to turn them into high information voters and then implement strategy.  Understand the voters needs and address their needs, don't just manipulate them and market to them.  Really listen.  Then come up with plans, and act.

Please don't feel that I'm trying to be offensive.  I'm not at all.  I actually felt your pain before the election was over, because I really worried it would go the way it did. The polls just felt too...  I don't know, maybe smug.  All eggs in one basket.  I don't mean to cause offense, at all, and I feel the same disappointment and fear that everyone feels.  But that's not enough.  It's time for the ranks of loyal yellow dog democrats, myself included, to revolt.  The Democrats have to listen to their natural base, the working people across the country who are hurting.  That's all races, sexes, sexual orientations, eye colors, piercing status, and number of tattoos.  Democrats need to stop talking down to their voters and start listening to them.  Stop being elitist and return to being real people of the people, and for the people.

I'm really thinking it's time to start a voter led revolt like what happened in the Republican Party.  Can't call it Tea Party - no no no no no no.  I don't have a name.  Yellow Dog Democrats United YDDU or something.  We need to start a Facebook group, use social media to organize, tell the Democrat party, we will not support you, not give you money - where did that get them this time? - not be polite to their rude telephone propagandists and solicitors an guilt mongers, but tell them to do their fucking job.  No more political dynasties, no to HIllary, no to Chelsea, no to Kennedies, yes to people who work hard for their voters and fight for them.

I was called today by a Democratic phone pool, and the guy did the usual start rude, immediately interrupt with fast talking, baiting tactic "Trump is going to...." and I talked over him, and said basically the same thing.  Stop scaring up money from loyal supporters - where did that get you last time?  Start listening to the Democratic base, the working people, the farmers, the people across the country who are hurting, stop manipulating people...  he hung up. 

Comment by Joseph P on December 17, 2016 at 10:16pm
Joseph, you just insulted EVERY low-information voter who ever lived!


Comment by Loren Miller on December 17, 2016 at 10:15pm

"Low information voters?!?"  Joseph, you just insulted EVERY low-information voter who ever lived!  I'm not even certain that the sizzle-vs-steak comparison holds here, because I doubt the average Drumpf voter knows what sizzle is!

Comment by Joseph P on December 17, 2016 at 10:15pm

Oh, and I was never really a believer, as far back as I can remember ... basically as soon as I was able to sort out an actual stance on something as complex as religious belief.  It was somewhere around the age of 9 or so that I had concluded that Christianity fell into the same category as Greek and Norse mythology, to which I had been exposed at the same time as (but not actually in) kindergarten.

I didn't fall into the trap of cynicism, though.  I dove.

Comment by Joseph P on December 17, 2016 at 10:09pm

You have to differentiate between Trump devotees and voters.  The devotees might have been voting rationally, for a given value of rational.  They know that they hate immigrants and minorities, and Trump is extremely anti-immigration ... or at least he was during the campaign.  They knew what they wanted.

Heh heh heh heh heh.  You could be onto something there, about Ken Burns, if he capitalizes on it.  After all, Joe the Plumber benefited greatly from his sudden bit of fame.  I don't know that Ken Burns is doing anything with his 15 minutes, but he possibly could, if he was so inclined.

I just meant his prior income level, before he was splashed all over the news and social media.

After all, I've seen sexy-Ken-Burns Halloween costumes, as scary as that is.  So, clearly people noticed.

Comment by tom sarbeck on December 17, 2016 at 10:05pm
Ruth, you used to believe...?

Who did not once believe what they'd been told? Welcome to the club.

Now, can you avoid the trap of cynicism?
Comment by tom sarbeck on December 17, 2016 at 9:58pm
Add this: Burns' documentary on Trump will interest viewers worldwide.
Comment by tom sarbeck on December 17, 2016 at 9:55pm
Did Trump's devotees vote rationally?

I figured they were so angry at their exploitation for thirty-plus years by the GOP Establishment that rationality had no part in anything they did.

As for Ken Burns' financial advantage, Trump's win will furnish Burns with material for a documentary as popular as the best of his others.
Comment by Joseph P on December 17, 2016 at 9:26pm

Err, when I say that conservatives have an edge, I mean that they tend to be much lower-information voters.  Christ, that was a horrible way to put it.

Comment by Joseph P on December 17, 2016 at 9:21pm

Yeah, most voters on either side are fairly low-information voters, but I think conservatives have an edge.  Anyone who thought that Trump was going to be a populist president, even though he ran a populist campaign, wasn't paying attention.

The signs were there, long before the election.  He's going to put his financial interests into a blind trust ... by having his children run his company ... his children who are being included in his meetings with foreign leaders.  And refusing to release his tax returns was a BIG red flag.  That and his rallies looked like fascism in action.

I just don't get it how anyone expecting him to govern in a manner that would be in their financial interests could be fooled.  Sure, anyone making more than a million dollars a year ... but anyone else, not so much.

Ken Burns said that voting for Trump would be to his financial advantage, but I doubt his analysis of the situation.  I want to know how much he makes per year.  I think that Ken was badly mistaken.



Update Your Membership :




Nexus on Social Media:


© 2017   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service