Politics, Economics, and Religion

Information

Politics, Economics, and Religion

Religion has so many connections to political and economic beliefs, there needs to be a place to identify linkages, problems, goals, options, action plans and evaluation criteria.  

Members: 103
Latest Activity: yesterday

What is the purpose of life?

An eternal question, what is the purpose of life?, occupied philosophers’ thoughts throughout history. Stone pictographs reveal even primitive peoples reflected on this query. Each one has the capacity to define his or her personal thinking about politics, economics and religion.

Discussion Forum

America - A Second-amendment Death Cult?

Started by Bertold Brautigan. Last reply by tom sarbeck yesterday. 13 Replies

This is a column by the Rude Pundit, in which he compares the NRA to Aztec high priests demanding death sacrifices.His conclusion:If we…Continue

Tags: NRA, guns

Biblical Family Values (AronRa)

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Bertold Brautigan Jul 13. 7 Replies

One of the most absurd and self-contradictory phrases out in the ether these days is that of "Family Values," usually thrown about by christians who challenge those who would attempt to make changes to usages and practices which they feel were…Continue

Tags: AronRa, Betty Bowers, bible, Talmud, Christian

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Politics, Economics, and Religion to add comments!

Comment by Joan Denoo on July 16, 2015 at 2:24am

There is no need to feel shame or regret if a woman knows she does not want to raise children. She has every right to make that decision, based on what is best for her. I have seen far too many women who did not want to be a mother and who did not have a patience or interest in mothering and who had unwanted children No one benefits by an unwanted child. Certainly, not the child. 

A woman's wishes and needs trump any religious dogma or social expectation. I respect a woman who knows herself well enough to not allow herself to get caught in a trap for which she knows she is not well suite.

I have the utmost respect for both of you, Felaine and Chris. You had wisdom and self-awareness at an early age, when to do so meant going against some people's norms. We need more women who can think independently. Each woman is responsible for taking care of her own body.  

Comment by Plinius on July 16, 2015 at 12:52am

Same for me Felaine.

Comment by sk8eycat on July 15, 2015 at 7:07pm

I knew by the time I was 13 that I never wanted to have children, so I didn't.  I had 3 abortions before The Pill was available, and before Roe v. Wade, and I have NEVER regretted it or felt ashamed. 

I would have been a lousy mother, and have never hesitated to tell people so.

Comment by Joan Denoo on July 15, 2015 at 1:11pm

Abortion is a nasty subject and one difficult to discuss without getting emotionally tangled. Those who oppose abortion have every right not to have an abortion. Those who have compassion for women know that abortion is not only an option, it is a necessary part of health care. If males developed a growth of some kind because of sexual intercourse, there would be a necessary law to protect the end of the growth. A fetus is a growth of cells that ultimately forms into a human. Women have the right to say "NO" to sexual intercourse, or use some form of contraceptive, or choose to abort. Women know they terminate a pregnancy and that is their right. It is also their burden. Fathers of aborted pregnancies have no say in the matter because they have no right to interfere with mother's rights. 

OH! I know! I will get hate mail for my position. Hate mail goes into the garbage bin.

A debate, on the other hand,  offers the opportunity to discuss both sides. I am able and willing to take on the topic. 

Thanks, Bertold, for the link. 

Comment by Bertold Brautigan on July 15, 2015 at 12:27pm

Salon ran a follow-up article on the Planned Parenthood sting:

Planned Parenthood’s biggest problem is not “selling baby parts”: W...

. . . No, Planned Parenthood is not illegally selling baby parts. Yes, the organization is donating fetal tissue and being reimbursed for transportation costs, which “is standard across the medical field,” according to Planned Parenthood spokesperson Eric Ferrero. The sting, which took place nearly a year ago, doesn’t tell us much about fetal tissue donation, a practice that Planned Parenthood is open(ish) about providing only now that it’s come under fire. Why we don’t talk about the practice more is worth discussing, but we’ll get to that in a moment.

First, let’s acknowledge the sting for what it is — the latest addition to an ongoing game of what we’ll call Deceitful Anti-Choice Mad Libs, which goes a little something like this: “This condensed, heavily edited video proves that Planned Parenthood does X horrifying thing in possible violation of Y federal law (except we don’t have much additional evidence about that whole ‘illegal’ part, so you’ll just have to trust us on this one).” It is the result of a carefully crafted attack that an anti-choice group has been working on for months, yet another example of an extreme viewpoint in an already polarized debate about abortion care.

Comment by sk8eycat on July 14, 2015 at 11:08pm

So organ-leggers are selling stem cells.  BFD.  How come amputees aren't lining up for a share?

Comment by Bertold Brautigan on July 14, 2015 at 8:28pm

This just out from Catholic Vote:

An interview with a high-level national Planned Parenthood employee coldly discussing sale of fetal body parts as business as usual.

So I wonder how this will pan out.

Why do I have the strangest feeling that if this story were legit it would be breaking in at least the grocery store tabloids, if not in more respectable publications.

Comment by tom sarbeck on July 9, 2015 at 1:35am

The free enterprise system we hear so much about has been a subsidy enterprise system at least since adoption of the 1787 constitution.

Evidence?

The agreement in the Convention to redeem at face value rather than at market value the paper that entitled Revolutionary War veterans to land. Speculators had paid needy veterans a fraction of the paper's value.

Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on July 8, 2015 at 10:07pm

"... $10 million a minute is how much the world’s governments are spending to subsidize the burning of coal, oil, and natural gas."

World Governments Subsidize the Burning of Fossil Fuels to the Tune...

Comment by Plinius on July 5, 2015 at 2:31am

They are still at it, Bertold, but they had different pictures in the fifties. I still like Doré's steel engravings...

 
 
 

© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service