Politics, Economics, and Religion

Information

Politics, Economics, and Religion

Religion has so many connections to political and economic beliefs, there needs to be a place to identify linkages, problems, goals, options, action plans and evaluation criteria.  

Members: 134
Latest Activity: yesterday

What is the purpose of life?

An eternal question, what is the purpose of life?, occupied philosophers’ thoughts throughout history. Stone pictographs reveal even primitive peoples reflected on this query. Each one has the capacity to define his or her personal thinking about politics, economics and religion.

Discussion Forum

Shrinkflation

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Bertold Brautigan yesterday. 5 Replies

Have you noticed that products get smaller every year? But often the box looks just as big, often with designed special air spaces.More than 2,500 products subject to shrinkflation,…Continue

Tags: cheating consumers, shrinkflation

Trump lies while POTUS

Started by Joan Denoo on Thursday. 0 Replies

Continue

Tags: POTUS, lies, Trump

We have dire Problems: Don’t be distracted by Trump’s Twitter Cascades

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Jul 10. 1 Reply

We have dire Problems: Don’t be distracted by Trump’s Twitter Cascades"I don’t tweet, but I do have a brief message for our president: Will you please…Continue

Tags: Mika, Kristol, insults, Crazy, Joe

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Politics, Economics, and Religion to add comments!

Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on January 7, 2017 at 5:45pm
Comment by Grinning Cat on January 7, 2017 at 2:45pm

Discussion about, and links for, the Indivisible Guide, and also the Call the Halls guide written by a Republican who voted for Clinton: http://atheistnexus.org/group/politics-economics-and-religion/forum...

Comment by Joseph P on January 7, 2017 at 1:34pm

Yeah, Indivisible was covered on Maddow, sometime around the end of this last week.

Comment by Bertold Brautigan on January 7, 2017 at 12:59pm

Even dead people are declining to perform for Trump


 NEWSWEEK


06 JAN 2017 AT 18:07 

Remember Nancy with the laughing face?

Comment by Bertold Brautigan on January 7, 2017 at 12:52pm

I just ran across this.

Comment by Grinning Cat on January 7, 2017 at 12:27pm

Trump in the Oval Office, refusing a thick “Daily intelligence briefing” while holding up a smartphone displaying “FAKE NEWS”: “Don’t bother. I’m already up to speed.”(click to embiggen)

Apropos: "Putin Led a Complex Cyberattack Scheme to Aid Trump, Report Finds" (yesterday's NYT)

"Mr. Trump told The New York Times in an interview that the storm surrounding Russian hacking was nothing more than a “political witch hunt” carried out by his adversaries, who he said were embarrassed by their loss to him in the 2016 election. Speaking by telephone three hours before the intelligence briefing, Mr. Trump repeatedly criticized the intense focus on Russia."

(via @MikeIsaac on Twitter)

Comment by Joseph P on January 7, 2017 at 12:06pm

Err, I'm not seeing where you're going with that.  Calling Trump a nonstop liar and exposing his lies would have been beneficial, if it meant that we didn't get him as a president.

I don't see how your comments apply to anything we're talking about.  Explain please.

Comment by tom sarbeck on January 7, 2017 at 12:34am
Joseph, when you'll never see a guy again you won't lose a lot if you call him on a lie.
When you will see him again, soon or often, you might want to be more tactful and say "There's more recent info you'll want to check."
But go ahead and your bridges if you like.
Comment by Joseph P on January 7, 2017 at 12:14am

When something is a blatant lie, there isn't anything to think about, in regards to that.  Now, if the WSJ wants to leave their readers open to whether or not Trump's blatant lying is a good or bad thing, that's different.

The basic fact of Trump's nonstop, aggressive, willful lies isn't really challenge-able, though, unless you want to be laughed at.

What you're letting slide is what has been behavior by the news organizations that is a lot like what creationists do, trying to shove their unscientific shit into high-school science classes.  The kids need the basic education on the objective facts, before they have any sort of valid opinion on the subject ... which they might someday have, somewhere around the post-graduate level.

Most people turning to the news do not already have a basic education on the facts.  Nor do they have the time and ability to weed through all of the details themselves to determine whether or not Trump is lying.  News programs of old used to actually try to educate people, not do the sort of wishy-washy, you-should-make-up-your-own-mind-whether-or-not-he's-lying presentation that you're proposing.

Comment by tom sarbeck on January 6, 2017 at 10:04pm
Pitts' concluding thought experiment omitted mention of whether there were enough reporters to cover both the ribbon cutting and the mall event.

Columnists and editors deal with different problems.
 
 
 

line

Update Your Membership :

Membership

line

line

Nexus on Social Media:

line

© 2017   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service