Politics, Economics, and Religion

Information

Politics, Economics, and Religion

Religion has so many connections to political and economic beliefs, there needs to be a place to identify linkages, problems, goals, options, action plans and evaluation criteria.  

Members: 129
Latest Activity: 16 hours ago

What is the purpose of life?

An eternal question, what is the purpose of life?, occupied philosophers’ thoughts throughout history. Stone pictographs reveal even primitive peoples reflected on this query. Each one has the capacity to define his or her personal thinking about politics, economics and religion.

Discussion Forum

The phony "freedoms" Republicans promise

Started by Grinning Cat. Last reply by Grinning Cat on Tuesday. 5 Replies

That's the title of Neil Buchanan's article in Newsweek (complete with irrelevant autoplaying video), reprinted from Justia's Verdict site where it has the title "…Continue

Tags: minimum wage, anti-abortion, anti-choice, scams, civil rights

Economics and Community values as to real estate owned by religious groups

Started by jlaz. Last reply by jlaz on Tuesday. 6 Replies

I've been wondering off and on for a long time as to two inter-related (as I see it) issues: 1) evolving how people find community interaction when they want it. 2) real estate values of Churches and similar. 1) So, what I mean by the first is…Continue

California Deregulation as Foreshadow

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Mar 8. 0 Replies

How the Energy Boys Fucked Over CaliforniaEven partial deregulation of the electricity market was a nightmare for California.In 2000 and…Continue

Tags: deregulation

More Pieces Of Donald Trump Russia Dossier Check Out (Rachel Maddow)

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Joseph P on Tuesday. 6 Replies

Originally when I first heard that there may have been a relationship between the Trump campaign and the Russians who were hacking the DNC and John Podesta, I wasn't sure whether to take those reports seriously.  With the information supplied here…Continue

Tags: John Podesta, Rachel Maddow, Russians, hacking, Drumpf

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Politics, Economics, and Religion to add comments!

Comment by Bertold Brautigan on July 4, 2015 at 2:53pm
Comment by sk8eycat on June 29, 2015 at 8:31pm

It IS brilliant!  And I'm halfway through rereading Fortunate Son for the 3rd or 4th time.  Makes me want to take the entire Bush family out and shoot them before they reproduce some more .  But they aren't the only ones....

Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on June 29, 2015 at 3:21pm

A great comic about deserved wealth.

Comment by Joan Denoo on June 21, 2015 at 11:26pm

Ruth, the graph tells an interesting story. I wonder what the family income was for people those years? I'll have to see if I can find out. 

Comment by Joan Denoo on June 21, 2015 at 11:22pm

Tom, thanks for the book lead,  Petr Kropotkin, in Mutual Aid; a factor in evolution. I downloaded it. My goodness, he has a lot of references. It will be a fun one to read. 

Petr Kropotkin, in Mutual Aid; a factor in evolution

Comment by Joan Denoo on June 21, 2015 at 11:16pm

Signed! 

Comment by tom sarbeck on June 21, 2015 at 6:56pm

Which initiative, sk8eycat?

There were four in all, two each year.

In each of those two years, I was one of hundreds of voters who gathered voters' signatures to put an initiative on the ballot that would amend the Government Code to take out the bribery and extortion that legislators can do.

In each of those two years, the legislature put an initiative on the ballot that would enact a few reforms but let them continue the bribery and extortion.

In each of those two years, voters wanted reform and passed both initiatives. Enough voters still trusted the legislature and its initiatives got a few more votes than our initiatives. And so, the legislators continued the bribery and extortion.

We decided that if they would not change their practices we would change their faces.

And so our third initiative called for term limits. It's a simple idea and the legislature was unable to confuse voters with another initiative.  

We knew term limits was not the best idea, but the legislature twice screwed us. They earned term limits.

Those who want to stay in government for more than two terms now have to persuade different sets of voters to elect them.

 

Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on June 21, 2015 at 2:36pm

sk8eycat, I agree with you about Bernie's Israel stance.

Alan, I think you preference for less government is doomed. Climate Destabilization will probably force the world to experiment with global government out of desperation. Climate negotiations among nations is classic tragedy of the commons.

On another note:

Comment by sk8eycat on June 21, 2015 at 10:24am

That's what I mean.  They go from the Assembly to the state Senate, and back and forth to whatever other elective, or appointed job they can get.

I knew that effing initiative was an unfunny joke when it was first proposed, and campaigned against it.  Loudly.  It's a stupid idea.

Comment by tom sarbeck on June 21, 2015 at 3:47am

sk8eycat, term limits suck for at least two reasons. They take power from legislators and give it to bureaucrats. They end the terms of both honest legislators and dishonest legislators.

Many Californians wanted to take the bribery and extortion out of campaign financing and TWICE put propositions on the ballot that, if the voters approved them, would do that.

Both times, the legislature screwed all Californians. Do you know how they did it? Do you want to know?

The reformers, not wanting the legislature to screw voters a third time, put the easier-to-understand term limits on the ballot and they passed.

The California legislature earned term limits.

 
 
 

line

Update Your Membership :

Membership

line

line

Nexus on Social Media:

line

© 2017   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service