Politics, Economics, and Religion


Politics, Economics, and Religion

Religion has so many connections to political and economic beliefs, there needs to be a place to identify linkages, problems, goals, options, action plans and evaluation criteria.  

Members: 119
Latest Activity: 6 hours ago

What is the purpose of life?

An eternal question, what is the purpose of life?, occupied philosophers’ thoughts throughout history. Stone pictographs reveal even primitive peoples reflected on this query. Each one has the capacity to define his or her personal thinking about politics, economics and religion.

Discussion Forum

Central banks and governments have lost the plot

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Joan Denoo 6 hours ago. 3 Replies

The Gold Bull Is BackI write what some call a "contrarian" point of view. The things I read and hear from commercial media is that we are in recovery, there are more jobs…Continue

Tags: wealth, destruction, stocks, depression, gold

A most interesting exercise in fantasy

Started by Bertold Brautigan. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on Sunday. 2 Replies

The One Speech That Could Turn Donald Trump From Villain To HeroPatheos - August 16, 2016 by Benjamin L. CoreyArticle…Continue

Tags: Trump

Global Elites Failing

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Aug 4. 0 Replies

The new challenge for climate action? PopulismDoug Hendrie sees the disenfranchised rejecting the globalization being…Continue

Tags: climate change, fossil fuel addiction, protectionism, nativism, nationalism

The Corporate Power Deadlock and Anthropogenic Climate Disruption

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Jul 21. 0 Replies

Will Denayer's article thrusts us into startling clarity, by summing up our climate/economic/political situation.How climate change…Continue

Tags: fossil fuel corporations deadlock on governments, climate model failures, Anthropogenic Climate Disruption

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Politics, Economics, and Religion to add comments!

Comment by Jennifer W on May 21, 2016 at 7:55am
I so want Bernie to win. I think the number one thing we have to do to not fail him is to vote in the smaller elections and make our voices and the message heard. I don't think he's going to get the superdelegates, that's Hillary's game. I'm not really looking forward to reluctantly vote for Hillary.
Comment by tom sarbeck on May 21, 2016 at 12:42am

Hey, folks, you're not seeing something that's real important.

Suppose Bernie beats Hillary and wins in November. Suppose too that Dems win control of both House and Senate.

As president, Bernie will be able to do only what a Congress that's corrupted by money -- Citizens United and more -- will let him do.

A recent interviewer pointed this out and asked him, if he's not elected president, will he ask his many supporters to reform Congress.

He said he will continue to seek the  nomination and, if he loses, consider doing that.

If Hillary is elected president, what will you do to move her in a progressive direction?

Comment by Bertold Brautigan on May 20, 2016 at 7:32pm

@Joseph - But doesn't Gibson get points for being right? Corporations pretty much do have that much power now, and pretty much use it as unscrupulously as he depicted. I guess the main difference between where we are and his dystopias is corporations stiil have to engage in lots of disinformation disseminating to get their way. If the Republicans win the election in November, they won't need to bother. I'm sure you've noticed how they no longer even feel the need to mask their true intentions.

Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on May 12, 2016 at 6:46pm

Joseph P, you really hit the nail on the head there!

Gotta love Citizens United.  It's the best in Orwellian doublespeak, calling a consortium of special-interest corporations a group of "citizens," with the stated objective of returning the government to citizens' control ... by which they mean the billionaires and multinational corporations.
Comment by Joseph P on May 12, 2016 at 6:44pm

Yeah, I've read a few of Gibson's books.  Did he do a single one that wasn't dystopian?  The guy has issues.

Sort of like SMBC, when we get a run of 7 or 8 comics in a row which are just dark and messed up as hell.  Makes me want to shoot him an e-mail: "Zach, you doing alright, man?"

Comment by Bertold Brautigan on May 12, 2016 at 5:43pm

>by which they mean the billionaires and multinational corporations.

Who continually make obscene profits and aren't even willing to help foot the bill for infrastructure that keeps them going. Back in the 80s sci fi writer William Gibson did a great job of projecting what (then) future corporatocracy would look like. In short, they've already drowned government in the bathtub and the 99% are reduced to fighting over the scum in the soap ring.

Comment by Joseph P on May 12, 2016 at 5:32pm

I'm all for Bernie staying in it until the end of the primaries, on June 14th.  But if he's still down more than 5 points then, it's time to suspend his campaign.

Sure, he can try to extract some concessions from Hillary, in exchange for going away.  I hope he can help push her further to the progressive end of things, on the issues for which she's less so than he is, but he needs to think of the good of the party and progressivism in general.

And he really needs to freaking lay off of any more negative ads against Hillary.

I'm afraid that we're a long way from the sort of electoral reform that you're talking about.  Before we even worry about that, we should get rid of the freaking electoral college and overturn Citizens United.

Gotta love Citizens United.  It's the best in Orwellian doublespeak, calling a consortium of special-interest corporations a group of "citizens," with the stated objective of returning the government to citizens' control ... by which they mean the billionaires and multinational corporations.

Comment by Bertold Brautigan on May 12, 2016 at 4:31pm

Which is Trump and which is the party?

Comment by Grinning Cat on May 12, 2016 at 9:43am

This convinced me that Bernie Sanders should stay in the race until someone actually gets the Democratic nomination for president:

Hillary Clinton Takes a Step to the Left on Health Care (NYTimes)

For months [...] Hillary Clinton has resisted calls from Senator Bernie Sanders to back a single-payer health system [...]

But as she tries to clinch the nomination, Mrs. Clinton is moving to the left on health care and this week took a significant step in her opponent’s direction, suggesting she would like to give people the option to buy into Medicare. [...]

Mr. Sanders calls his single-payer health care plan “Medicare for all.” What Mrs. Clinton proposed was a sort of Medicare for more. [...]

(Hillary Clinton campaigned at the Mug ‘n Muffin in Stone Ridge, Va., on Monday. Credit Doug Mills/The New York Times)

Comment by Grinning Cat on May 12, 2016 at 9:30am

Agreed on superdelegates as crap!

Why not have a short campaign season (with publicly funded airtime for all candidates who reach a reasonable threshold of signatures), then a single election with range voting -- voters give separate scores to each candidate, highest average wins. No primaries, no spoilers.

(Each candidate can get a predetermined number of artificial "0" votes, to prevent the "unknown lunatic wins" scenario where a candidate wins with a tiny, rabid following while most voters have "no opinion".)



Update Your Membership :




Nexus on Social Media:


© 2016   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service