Atheist Foundation of Australia are at it again!

I'm beginning to think that the AFA is a little anachronistic organisation desperately trying to make itself seem relevant. It appears to be joining the ranks of the theists in making all sorts of unsupported scientific claims. Is it not enough just to be atheist? Is it not enough just to state that they lack belief in god(s)? Unfortunately for us besieged Australian atheists, it is not enough for them. The particular statement that sticks with me is the following:

"No personality or mind can exist without the process of living matter to sustain it."

I have a number of issues with this statement. Firstly, what is an atheist organisation doing speculating on the nature of mind and consciousness? What does it have to do with a god or gods? Secondly why not leave this question to the scientists and physicians that are currently studying it? There are peer reviewed detailed studies published by multiple physicians which discuss this very topic. In fact, one paper states the following in its abstract:

"2% described awareness with explicit recall of ‘seeing’ and ‘hearing’ actual events related to their resuscitation. One had a verifiable period of conscious awareness during which time cerebral function was not expected."

ref http://www.resuscitationjournal.com/article/S0300-9572%2814%2900739-4/pdf

This one statement point blank contradicts the AFA "philosophy" statement. So why is the AFA engaging in "philosophical" statement of this type instead of sticking to its business of being an atheist organisation?

Well, I'm not sure if anyone can answer this question except for the AFA itself but I thought that I would share my frustration of their antics with others. Maybe I will feel better at least!

Load Previous Comments
  • Justin Murray

    So, you want to give the AFA any feedback.

    Which means you don't want them to improve.

    You are not  trying to point out areas of improvement.

    That was all lies, right?

  • Vangelis

    @ Justin

    Please stop attacking the messenger. Attack the message if you are looking for something to attack.

    The AFA are already aware of this issue. They don't seem to respond to the feedback. As I said, I have been down that particular rabbit hole and it leads nowhere.

  • Justin Murray

    Pointing out hypocrisy is not an attack.