Do men doctors actually understand patients who are not men?

Could it be men doctors (MDs) don't understand how
conditions of wellness or disease manifest in women
and children at all so they don't bother to interpret
salient data in these patients. Instead, ritual
proceedures make up the main stay of medical
care for women (ceasarian section operations,
masdectomys and hysterectomies) and children
(Thimerisol laden vaccines, ritalin , fluoride, silver
and mercury tooth fillings which expand and contract unlike
the enamel and dentin they fill and silver nitrate inoculations
for the eyeballs of new borns). More please, give me more...kind sir.

Views: 782


You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!

Join Atheist Nexus

Comment by Avicenna on September 22, 2011 at 10:36am
You do know that flouride in our water has stopped caries teeth dead in it's tracks which is one of the leading causes of tooth loss? 

It saves millions in dental bills and even more in lost working hours.

It's simple. We can compare India who don't have fluoridated water with the USA. Caries teeth is insanely common in villages with well water but in the cities where people have fluoridated tooth paste it's very rare.

Seriously the anti-fluoride deal is based on the fact that in "normal quantities it is a poison". Just like how in normal quantities willow bark can cause liver failure and death... Or how foxgloves can cause heart arrests.

Your well informed dentist knows what they are talking about. Stop listening to quacks.
Comment by Clarence Dember on September 22, 2011 at 12:25am
Top fluoride expert apologises for pushing poison 05/ 28/ 00
Dr. Hardy Limeback is Canada' s leading fluoride authority and until
the country' s primary promoter of the controversial additive. In a
surprising newsmaker interview this past April, Dr. Limeback announced
a dramatic change of heart. "Children under three should never use
fluoridated toothpaste," he counselled. "Or drink fluoridated water. And
baby formula must never be made up using Toronto tap water. Never."
"Your well- intentioned dentist is simply following 50 years of
misinformation from public health and the dental association. Me, too.
Unfortunately, we were wrong."
Comment by Clarence Dember on August 30, 2011 at 4:37pm
Delete Comment
To Grace.: I've said Medical Doctors are ONE aspect of care. The context of my
blog does not attempt to do away with other branches of patient care. Medical
Doctors do this rather heavy handedly. I never tried to eliminate other practices
attempting to 3rd party bill.
On the one hand, you have legal work and help being given and received and
business being legitimately and ethically conducted on the other hand you have
a whole litany of dispursions and black public relations campaigns run by guess
who? All this to gain monopoly over patient care. But Medical practice is finite
discrete and unable to comprise other helping credentials. They have failed to kill
every other profession because it's not in their jurisdiction. And may be all of the
good the medical practice has ever done is already amply represented in their
plentiful advertisements they pay for. Should we form a panel to study this?
Comment by Grace Fitzpatrick on August 30, 2011 at 3:52pm
You don't have to go doctors if you don't want, Clarence.  No one is going to make you.  Is it all doctors you don't like or just some?  Do you also dislike optometrists and dentists?  I don't have dental problems (thank goodness) but serious dental pain can really    throw a wrench in your enjoyment of life.  A good pair of glasses can do a lot to improve your quality of life (if you need them), too.
Comment by Clarence Dember on August 30, 2011 at 3:46pm
To John D. Your right May be some one out there in the audience wants to be entertained by John D. May be you should start an entertainment blog.
Comment by Clarence Dember on August 30, 2011 at 3:42pm
Off topic. I don't care if you quit responding.
Comment by Clarence Dember on August 30, 2011 at 2:34pm
To John D.

Could it be that most of my troubles come from religious idealogues who practice medicine, education, law and philosophy but put forth their respective dogmas as though they were facts and science. Their goal is to undermine the autonomy and certainty of the individual at every stage. This is why the causes of conditions can never be known to them. They would be out of a job.
Do you get it? No one cares about your quest to dominate others. Since I have refrained from diagnosing your obscure personal motivation, what on Earth would motivate you to attempt to paraphrase mine?
Comment by Clarence Dember on August 30, 2011 at 1:23pm
THE ONION OF CONTROL That first part about
taking away something a person possesses and
substituting something else resonates in my
early years with my mother's anti Whistler
gambit. ( I'll explain.) The reschedule of
process employed by Christian doctrine also
derailed me for a time (substitution of St.
Martin of Tours uniforms and Dominican order
controls for my early desire to attend a military
academy). But ultimately this can only work if
your tormentor hates you. "My Uncle Sonny
told my dad "she's (my mom) got control of
him now". I had stopped listening to them (my
dad and his brother) because my mother had
slapped the spit out of my face for whistling
hymns in church. Although we males had had
whistling contests in the past (my dad and
uncle taught me how to whistle) all that was
over once I had been visiously publicly savaged
by my mother in church. Faith works wonders
it is said. Since I didn't want more of that kind
of treatment I "minded" (ingested whole") what
my mother said. There are no pictures in our
family albums of me with My Dad and my
Uncle Sonny although my dad's older brother
had been in my life till this point. My
hypervigilence had thus been conflated to the
prior birth shock and dismay of silver nitrate
eye drops burning and causing my first spell of
unconsciousness. Thereafter, the dope taken
up by my nevous system then limited my
progress for many years and was only
compounded by the pain and treason of the
whistling gambit and the hit learn instruction
weilded by the Dominican nuns I and my
cohort faced defenseless for 8 long years . Yet
now, the onion is pealed away and only my
enemies are weeping . (This originally penned in reply to a blog here about "how to destroy a person."
Comment by Clarence Dember on August 23, 2011 at 12:15am
oh, back from Safari John D.? I'm certain at least I don't care what's your brain is driving your fingers to type, but this is "water cooler" so you have found a home.
Comment by Clarence Dember on August 23, 2011 at 12:06am
Still, my theory goes like this:
The more things I ask my body to process with no return for it's work, the more broken down it becomes. Like asking my car to take me to
California with no oil or coolant. Outcome not
good and no thanks, soap is just fine.


Update Your Membership :




Nexus on Social Media:


© 2017   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service