I am getting terribly frustrated lately with a certain experience, and the more I think on it, the more I believe it to be a common one among Americans and maybe the world in general. The experience I refer to is in trying to express myself to a religious person and having that person cut off the conversation because my facts or opinions make them uncomfortable.

Unfortunately for me, this hits quite close to home. My close friend is a member of a highly religious group, although they (the individual) are not practicing. I don't know if that's a rare thing in itself or simply contradicts the image their community wants to portray. Anyway, the differences in our belief/non-belief make some conversations difficult, to be sure. But instead of respectful discourse, I find that lately they prefer to avoid those talks altogether. This is a recent change in their behavior and I can't help but think they're doing it defensively to protect them from becoming doubtful.

It is a tragedy that anyone would choose to live in ignorance. It is disappointing and frustrating that I am not fully allowed to express myself to this person in the way I once did. Part of the reason for this blog, a large part, is that I do not have a group locally where I can feel safe discussing these topics without feeling I'm being judged or offending someone. Now that support has become more tenuous with my friend.

I was inspired to write this when I started an innocuous conversation about how I spent my day. I mentioned a discovered an exciting story in one of the books of the bible that were deemed Apocrypha, or not officially part of the bible narrative. My friend cut me off before I could say any more and stated that they didn't believe in that. I asked for clarification, because it was easy to understand if a person didn't believe the stories in the Apocrypha were true. But instead, they stated they didn't believe that books had been removed from the bible, ever. 

I was dumbfounded. Out of respect for them, I discontinued talking about it. But I was also hurt. Their vulnerability of faith causes them to refuse to hear facts, even in passing mention, even when it denies a friend the courtesy of conversation. I can only speculate on my friend's thoughts and reasoning, of course, but I was a person of faith once upon a time. I can remember what it was like trying to hold onto that faith in the face of contrary evidence.

It isn't a pleasant experience for most people to have your worldview called into question. It can be terrifying to be told from religious authorities that doubting their words will make the divine angry with you, so you must do all you can to maintain your belief. Ironically, fear of slipping in faith demonstrates real faith in the consequences.

I want to have a good relationship with this person, and in all other respects we get along fantastically. I enjoy their company. I try to respect their point of view and never attack them for having faith. It is hard to be the atheist in a believer/non-believer conflict because only the believer feels truly threatened, and that stirs me to pity. I have more conviction now than they do, but then I have reality on my side. How could they not react defensively when their worldview is always under attack? 

Ideally, I would like my friend to share my point of view. But some people need to believe in a higher power. Some people need a community and a cause bigger than themselves. I want to express to them that my community is humankind. My cause is understanding, peace, and compassion for all. 

I can't yet bring myself to say that I'm a Humanist. In my mind, it suggests reverence, faith, even deification of humanity. I am still sorting out the first two but the third is out of the question. Being an ex-Christian is still new to me, so forgive the false assumptions.

Views: 130


You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!

Join Atheist Nexus

Comment by Andrew on March 27, 2017 at 9:49pm
I thought you were going to say that the person cut you off and wouldn't let you get a word in edgewise, because that was my most recent experience. I was verbally run over with my "associate's" strident, dogmatic nonsense, unable to make any point without being repeatedly interrupted by the phrase, "If you read the bible,"... Since this is a professional relationship, I let it drop. Anyway, if my beliefs were revealed in that environment, it would probably create a strain that is not worth having to deal with.
Comment by Michael Penn on March 19, 2017 at 10:52am

I can certainly agree with Compelled in investigating the origins of the Canon. How we got the bible is essential to structures of what believers call their "faith." Once you see exactly how we got the bible you are less likely to take it as an infallible word of god. In fact, without the book of Genesis nobody needs Jesus, salvation, redemption, justification, forgiveness, and many other religious things accepted as necessary by many.

Would we then say that Jesus was a "good idea?" Why would anyone believe in the ridiculous Genesis story and even a talking snake?

Without a doubt, origins of the Canon would help you and your friend to talk. An understanding of this subject along with essays of Jerry DeWitt actually brought me to atheism.

Comment by Compelledunbeliever on March 13, 2017 at 9:13pm

Look up Humanism. It really in my words is respect for humanity. Theist often question where or how we can have morals. Humanism is not exactly a moral concept in itself but many find solid moral concepts in humanism.
As far as your friend is concerned I wish you the best of luck! Often patience and simple love for a friend is enough to get you through. I've noticed that it is a common human trait that the strongest opinions seem to come from a position of ignorance. When one is ignorant of a subject they are also ignorant of how much they don't know. Thus, they tend to feel very strongly they know the truth. It is once one has invested a great deal of time in a subject that they become aware of how ignorant they actually are. This is why many experts in a subject claim ignorance in the subject that they know more about than anyone else. They are not just being modest, they truly realize just how ignorant they are.
The solution that works for me is to give friends references at the introductory level on the given subject or actually show them. One must also understand that many theist are afraid to look into how their religious dogma actually historically came about. This is for two reasons, they don't want to find out their wrong or their religion has brainwashed them into believing that if they do look into it they will be attacked by Satan or go to Hell.
So try to identify what your friends fear is or why they may be resistant to investigating the origins of the Canon, if that is the case. If not there is no reason you can't give him a book like How we got the bible.

© 2019   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: The Nexus Group.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service