I'm a fan of George Lakoff from his book Don't Think of an Elephant! and assorted videos of his presentations. His idea of frames presents good reasons why we can't just kick over a few theistic talking points (even when we're right) and expect to have believers drop everything and take up our banner. It doesn't matter that we have science and reason on our side; they'll keep inventing new ways to square their circles (to quote Hitchens) or find an excuse to duck out of the debate entirely. Sure, it's kinda fun to do this from time to time, but long term, we aren't getting very far. For the long term, we need our own set of frames.

George suggests that we need to know our collective values before we do so though, so we should work on that. Yes, I know -- "getting atheists together is like herding cats, you just can't do it". As a cat owner, I know this isn't true -- just start shaking a bag of treats and watch the result. I think there are some core values most of us can agree to.

* Freedom: The "free" in freethinker. We do not feel the need to be treated as children who need guidance and support from some higher power every waking moment (and some non-waking ones) to do the right thing or steer our thinking for us. We don't need to follow dogma of any kind -- religious, political, or otherwise.

* Evaluation: The "thinker" in freethinker. Ideas need to be tested, often many times, especially as new facts and evidence appear. I believe this is more essential than 'science' or 'logic'. Though our value of evaluation, we assert responsibility and ongoing development of our ethics and knowledge (not just scientific knowledge, either). Evaluation demands we put our observations into the crucible to see if it is indeed the gold of truth that we have seen or heard about.

NB: I don't mean to push the "freethinker" label on folks, just highlight the values this conveys that seem relevant to us all.

Some other values that are common (but arguably less so) include science, knowledge, and free inquiry, but I find the above two are "core values" that the rest follow from.

Comments encouraged as always. Sorry this took so long to get out; kind of languished next to some other projects of mine. I know it's not as content-rich as I would like it to be.

Views: 13


You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!

Join Atheist Nexus

Comment by Zevaeros on September 29, 2008 at 10:43am

Intellectual honesty is somewhat covered under the "evaluation" value, but it is a good one all the same.

I wouldn't necessarily say every atheist is anti-supernatural -- many are, but I've heard plenty of people call into shows like "The Atheist Experience", claim they're an atheist, freethinker, or what have you, then proceed to posit something, for lack of a better phrase, "out there". For most atheists, sure, I would agree.

It is a point though that maybe we should be thinking beyond just the terms we have right now; something that's more motivating than just unbelief. We'll see how that works.
Comment by Randall "Doc" Fleck on September 29, 2008 at 9:57am
I would add basic intellectual honesty to our set of shared core values.

We freethinkers tend to find it very difficult (even impossible) to accept any notion on its face value alone and we admit to that honestly. We examine our own doubts on ever question which confronts us and we make no self-protective excuses for our own personal shortcomings whenever we discover them.



Update Your Membership :




Nexus on Social Media:


© 2018   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service