Creationism threatens to slip into UK schools

The National Secular Society has sounded an alarm over plans to insinuate creationism into secondary schools in Hampshire.

The proposal comes from a local Standing Advisory Council on Religious Education (SACRE), one of hundreds in the UK that are responsible in law for advising local education authorities on RE and collective worship. Hampshire SACRE has recommended that evolution and creationism be taught jointly in RE and science lessons.

The new unit of work was set up after Clive Erricker, county inspector for RE, was asked to examine the suitability of a dual approach. According to the local paper, the Daily Echo, Mr Erricker said: “The tensions between religion and science should not be denied but nor should we paint a black and white picture.” Mr Erricker said the evolution-creationism debate is “complex” but can be simplified and has written a teachers’ guide with subjects for pupils to study. When asked how it would work in practice, Mr Erricker said: “There are no models. We will create a new model of learning.”

It really shouldn't need pointing out, but Creationism has no place in the science class and the Theory of Evolution certainly doesn't belong in the RE classroom.

Government guidance on the teaching of creationism in science lessons states:

Creationism and intelligent design are not part of the science National Curriculum programmes of study and should not be taught as science. However, there is a real difference between teaching ‘x’ and teaching about ‘x’. Any questions about creationism and intelligent design which arise in science lessons, for example as a result of media coverage, could provide the opportunity to explain or explore why they are not considered to be scientific theories and, in the right context, why evolution is considered to be a scientific theory.

NSS president, Terry Sanderson points out:

There is a big difference between answering students’ questions about creationism and actually introducing it into the lessons in the first place as part of the curriculum. If the teacher raises the topic, then it takes on an authority that it does not deserve. Hampshire should think again about this proposal. It will add nothing to the education of children, but will create confusion in their minds about what is science and what is religion.

Views: 25


You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!

Join Atheist Nexus

Comment by Paul on March 9, 2009 at 2:58pm
So do I. Hopefully, the fact that the NSS are making a noise about it already will mean that this particular scheme will be squashed before it starts.
Comment by Jennifer W on March 8, 2009 at 11:07pm
urgh. I hope this doesn't start a bad trend over there, like here in the US!!!



Update Your Membership :



Nexus on Social Media:

© 2019   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: The Nexus Group.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service