Interesting Response from my State Representative

I present to you: The uneducated politician...

I sent a letter to my state representative regarding the availability of contraceptive coverage for ALL people.  Notice I said "availability."  This is the response I received:

Dear Kristen:


Thank you for contacting me to share your thoughts about regulations that will require employers to cover contraceptives. I appreciate hearing from you.


I support reforming health care in a cost-effective manner which allows individuals to take control over their own health care decisions. It is important that we do not force religiously-affiliated businesses to adhere to regulations that violate their beliefs. I oppose government intrusion into our personal lives and believe that the federal government should not dictate our health care options and choices. I am a strong supporter of increasing access to affordable health care by increasing consumer protections, extending coverage to individuals with pre-existing conditions, allowing young adults to remain on their parents' health care plans, and preventing unjust policy cancellations. These initiatives would serve to make health care more affordable and accessible without passing on crushing debt to future generations. I also understand the importance placed on contraceptive coverage for women who are employed by an organization that is not religiously affiliated. I will keep your thoughts in mind if I have a voting opportunity on relevant legislation, and I will continue to work to balance the needs of the individual while maintaining the religion freedom that is guaranteed in the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America. I will also share your comments with my House colleagues. I am certain they will benefit from your views. 


As a resident of Florida's Twelfth District, your comments and opinions are an important source of information to help me carry out my duties as your federal representative.  In that regard, please do not hesitate to contact me in the future on any issue important to you.  Also, if you would like to be informed more frequently about my work in Congress and in Florida's Twelfth Congressional District, please visit my website at to sign up for regular email or to send me a message.  


Again, thank you for sharing your thoughts with me. 



Sincerely yours,
Gus M. Bilirakis
Member of Congress

Now, forget for a moment that the main topic of the letter is health care.  Let's look at what he's really saying about the First Amendment.  He's equating the guarantee of religious freedom with the AVAILABILITY of birth control.  As if having the equal opportunity to use birth control is some kind of infringement on their religious beliefs.  I guess we shouldn't allow them to have opportunities for jobs that require work on Sundays, or any other opportunity that their holy book says is wrong.  This guy has it completely backwards.  He would rather TAKE from people, than GIVE them equal opportunity.  

Views: 162


You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!

Join Atheist Nexus

Comment by Dyslexic's DOG on September 16, 2013 at 4:03am

He is evidently pandering to his support from the religious bodies, sounds like a GOP representative.  Extremely low IQ and almost negative RQ.

You need rational leaders, not irrational dead heads.

I believe all leaders in a community should have a Rationality Quotient test and those that fall below being 80% rational in their decision making should automatically be axed.

Wit RQ, it can be improved through education, so if the want to get back into public leadership, they need to undertake rationality training.

Likely if they apply such rationality training to their own lives and philosophies, they would at least be Agnostics, if not Atheists.

This is now my view on Politicians.

Only the rational ones should be allowed a position, this makes their policies and decisions safer for all.

The irrational ones, must either learn to be rational and pass RQ testing.

Otherwise they should look for jobs that require no Rationality like church priests and ministers.

Comment by Craigart14 on September 14, 2013 at 10:16am

What is a religiously affiliated business?  A hospital founded by a church but now running on tax dollars?  A farm with a fanatical evangelical owner?  What other conditions can they refuse to cover for "religious" reasons?  Can they deny coverage to people who are overweight because they consider gluttony a deadly sin?  Prenatal care to unwed mothers?

Comment by Kristen Clevidence on September 10, 2013 at 10:59am

Exactly.  I'm not so much surprised, just really disappointed that so many people don't see this argument for what it is.  Sad.

Comment by Michael Penn on September 10, 2013 at 10:48am

He has it all about as backwards as any other politician. It works for them, and this is how they get re-elected. They speak from both sides of their mouths and the "supportive letters" they send you makes everybody want to vote for them again.

Did they actually cover your issue in any way?   NO.



Update Your Membership :




Nexus on Social Media:


© 2018   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service