I found this a very amusing debate.
Quite humorous comments from both sides.
But, the well was already poisoned by Michael Shermer before Lennox started his preconceived spiel.
Lennox made every mistake Shermer already gave an answer to in his first argument.
Lennox continually used the following fallacies:
"It is not possible to:" (An argument from ignorance, is following and a Dunning-Kruger effect ( "I Know") bit of nonsense is included).
So a "Nobel prize winning scientist stated", Straw man argument will be following.
Fact is: All scientists who turn their attention to god had stopped being scientifically credible and productive scientists after their turning to god.
This is true for every scientist in history, once they put a god in their hypothesis, their scientific thinking and advancement ceased entirely. Newton was a great example of this, even Laplace who continued Newton's work, stated that Newton could easily have left himself nothing to discover, had he not given up and installed supernatural thinking into his hypothesis. Essentially Newton gave up and simply threw up his hands and said, it is too complex, I cannot explain it, thus god is involved.
Thus Newton installed his own argument from ignorance.
John Lennox, does not do science, so all his comments stating he does are a total Lie!
Essentially Lennox is old hat.
His arguments are all idiotic and such Christian apologetics are now so lame, that I really wonder why the likes of John Lennox, keep exposing themselves as idiots to the public.
I love the audience question concerning the "Mind Of God", and the amount of crap Lennox replies with.
Faith is going to tell him what science cannot discover.
Some apologists are soooo Lame!
Especially John Lennox!
I posted this blog, as I think many of you may find this debate quite entertaining.
It also provides many great arguments from Michael Shermer, that you can use against ignorant theists.
I was taking notes and will be using many of Shermer's arguments in the next few days in my own debates.