This just in from the California Supreme Court:

"(San Francisco, California, November 19, 2008)—Today the California Supreme Court granted review in the legal challenges to Proposition 8, which passed by a narrow margin of 52 percent on November 4. In an order issued today, the Court agreed to hear the case and set an expedited briefing schedule. The Court also denied an immediate stay.

On November 5, 2008, the National Center for Lesbian Rights, the American Civil Liberties Union, and Lambda Legal filed a lawsuit challenging the validity of Proposition 8 in the California Supreme Court on behalf of six couples and Equality California. The City of San Francisco, joined by the City of Los Angeles, the County of Los Angeles, and Santa Clara County, filed a similar challenge, as did a private attorney in Los Angeles.

The lawsuits allege that, on its face, Proposition 8 is an improper revision rather than an amendment of the California Constitution because, in its very title, which was “Eliminates the right to marry for same-sex couples,” the initiative eliminated an existing right only for a targeted minority. If permitted to stand, Proposition 8 would be the first time an initiative has successfully been used to change the California Constitution to take away an existing right only for a particular group. Such a change would defeat the very purpose of a constitution and fundamentally alter the role of the courts in protecting minority rights. According to the California Constitution, such a serious revision of our state Constitution cannot be enacted through a simple majority vote, but must first be approved by two-thirds of the Legislature.

Since the three lawsuits submitted on November 5, three other lawsuits challenging Proposition 8 have been filed. In a petition filed on November 14, 2008, leading African American, Latino, and Asian American groups argued that Proposition 8 threatens the equal protection rights of all Californians.

On November 17, 2008, the California Council of Churches and other religious leaders and faith organizations representing millions of members statewide, also filed a petition asserting that Proposition 8 poses a severe threat to the guarantee of equal protection for all, and was not enacted through the constitutionally required process for such a dramatic change to the California Constitution. On the same day, prominent California women’s rights organizations filed a petition asking the Court to invalidate Proposition 8 because of its potentially disastrous implications for women and other groups that face discrimination.

In May of 2008, the California Supreme Court held that barring same-sex couples from marriage violates the equal protection clause of the California Constitution and violates the fundamental right to marry. Proposition 8 would completely eliminate the right to marry only for same-sex couples. No other initiative has ever successfully changed the California Constitution to take away a right only from a targeted minority group.

Over the past 100 years, the California Supreme Court has heard nine cases challenging either legislative enactments or initiatives as invalid revisions of the California Constitution. In three of those cases, the Court invalidated those measures."

For more information on this case, go here.

I’m hopeful about this. A high-profile case of this kind is exactly the forum needed to drive a legal stake into the demonic stillbirth of Prop 8, once and for all. It’s about more than gay rights, although that would be enough. Apparently what none of the mentally diseased proponents of Prop 8 considered was that their pet hatred could open the door to legal discrimination rescinding anyone’s rights, for any reason the mob dreams up. No marriage for gays? Well then, why not deny child custody rights to atheists? Perhaps we should rescind the rights of Muslims in California to bequeath property to their children. Or maybe just left-handed Muslims over six feet tall. I mean, why not? According to the precedent of Prop 8, any majority mob of mouth-breathers can pick their favorite enemy and strip away their civil rights, one by one.

It will be a good day when Prop 8 goes down, stake in heart, head cut off and sewn-up mouth filled with salt, buried in an iron coffin with spikes on the inside. Upside down.

Views: 17


You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!

Join Atheist Nexus

Comment by Roxanne on November 20, 2008 at 7:32am
That gave me an idea. Imagine, just for a moment, the idea of a law passed eliminating the rights of religious leaders to vote. Since our nation is defined as having Church and State separated, church leaders cannot actually claim their political decisions aren't determined by their religion. Therefore their votes are biased and irrelevant and cannot be included in the tallys.

How would that amendment look to them?



Update Your Membership :



Nexus on Social Media:

© 2020   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: The Nexus Group.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service