Referencing this article, does anyone else find this whole situation completely retarded? The supreme court judges are debating the wrong issue!
No one would object to participating in a health plan voluntarily. It is wrong to use force to coerce any one.
The Christians are right, but for the wrong reasons. Irony abounds.
And now we have a legal quagmire that will only thicken as time goes on.
Finally, in reading her long-winded opinion essay I noticed that Justice Ginsburg really seems to like the argument from consequences fallacy. Surely other people caught on to this?