Every so often, someone will tell me that atheists are impossible to debate, because they think they know it all.  Someone will tell me that I am dismissing their claims before I have even heard them.  They accuse me of shutting out the “evidence” they have to “prove” god’s existence.  They say I am doing what I accuse them of doing:  sticking fingers in the ears and screaming, “La-La-la! Can’t hear you!”

Well, they may have a point.  I guess.

The truth is I’m not really doing this.  I’m not sticking my fingers in my ears.  It’s just that I’ve heard this before.  Care to guess how many times I’ve been approached with the first cause argument?  Or the argument from design? Or pascal’s wager?  Or the ontological argument?  Seriously. 

I help run a student organization at my local university.  One of the things we are doing now is going over these arguments that are so common; they may as well be mantras.  A few of the younger members haven’t heard these before, and I want them to understand that these are not new arguments and they have been refuted by people WAY smarter than I long before I could spell atheist.

So if I cut someone off when they begin with, “Everything has a cause…” and insert immediately, “What caused god?”, it’s not that I have fingers in my ears, it’s I’ve heard this before.  When they begin with, “God is the greatest thing we can imagine…” and I cut them off with, “So you admit god is imaginary,” I just want to skip the long explanation I know is coming.  And when they fall back to, “What if you’re wrong?”, I just smile and ask, “What if you’re wrong about Zeus?” 

It’s not that I know everything.  It is completely possible that there is an argument out there I’ve not heard and will actually have to consider.  Thus far, that has not happened.

Oh, and back to my student group:  We entertained briefly the idea of having “mock debates” where one of us would take the opposing side and argue for it.  We wanted to be sure we were not attacking strawmen and that the actual arguments were justly represented.  But when this came to practice, we couldn’t figure out how to do it in a way that would not at least appear that we were attacking strawmen.   So we just present the argument and refute it in a discussion.

Views: 77

Comment

You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!

Join Atheist Nexus

line

Update Your Membership :

Membership

line

line

Nexus on Social Media:

line

Latest Activity

Jennifer Miller posted a status
"I am an atheist, living in Medford Oregon, and going to business school at Southern Oregon University."
13 minutes ago
Bertold Brautigan commented on Joan Denoo's group Politics, Economics, and Religion
24 minutes ago
Bertold Brautigan commented on Dr. Ernest Williamson III's status
27 minutes ago
Daniel W commented on Dr. Ernest Williamson III's status
52 minutes ago
Profile IconJoshua , Joel Newman, Agnostic Atheist and 1 more joined Atheist Nexus
58 minutes ago
Thomas Murray replied to Imaginary Cat Owner's discussion Is there a problem with the chat section?
3 hours ago
Thomas Murray commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
3 hours ago
Thomas Murray commented on Little Name Atheist's group Atheist Ailurophiles
4 hours ago

© 2017   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service